Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> in gaining the acceptance of desired measures. Ms. Smith feels that one <br /> . of the hardest parts will be community education and stressed the need <br /> e to have affected groups involved in the policy committee right from the <br /> beginning. Ms. Miller concurred that they would have to be involved <br /> because of the need for much community-wide support. She added that one, <br /> however, should not overemphasize what the Policy Board can do. Mr. <br /> Keller summarized the Council's statements by saying that they seemed to <br /> want to include the public and to complete the task in timely fashion <br /> which eliminates options A and B and points to Option C. <br /> Manager suggested that Council might establish parameters for the size <br /> of the affected interest groups on the policy board. Mr. Obie felt <br /> it best not to have interest groups on the board itself, but make certain <br /> the board receives their input, whether through a public hearing process, <br /> direct conversation, etc. In answer to a question from Ms. Smith, Mr. <br /> Page said that some of the interest groups involved in the City of <br /> Portland's process were Northwest Natural Gas, Portland General Electric, <br /> US National Bank, Retail Employees Local, architects, and consulting <br /> engineers. There were no Council members involved in the process. Ms. <br /> Miller said it was hard to imagine a committee of workable size that is <br /> represented by a wide enough section of interest groups. She feels it <br /> necessary to have some imaginative meeting procedures to encourage public <br /> input and citizen involvement, rather than going through the typical <br /> public hearing procedures wherein people testify and the matter is then <br /> turned over to the board. She felt perhaps a round-table discussion <br /> format would be more appropriate. Ms. Schue agreed with Ms. Miller's <br /> suggestion. Councilors agreed that early community involvement would <br /> e eliminate possible problems in the future. Mayor Keller said he is <br /> grappling with the issue of whether the special interest groups' involve- <br /> ment would be compatible with the decision-making process of the board. <br /> Mr. Page said staff could put together a work program if Council would <br /> select an option which best reflects their preference for proceeding. <br /> Councilors agreed that Option C came the closest, and Mr. Page said staff <br /> could come back in three weeks with outlines on committee structure and <br /> meeting format. Mayor Keller wondered if Boeing could be a resource on <br /> refining benefits of solar energy. Mr. Page said they could be contacted <br /> as well as the University, which has a solar program, plus local builders. <br /> Mr. Keller suggested that interest groups could be notified by written <br /> invitation to participate. <br /> VI. COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLANS--STAFF PRESENTATION <br /> A status report on the 1979-'80 priority work programs and projects of the <br /> Council, as developed as the McKenzie Bridge Goal Session in September, <br /> has been distributed to Councilors. The report translates the goals into <br /> specific projects. The various sections include intergovernmental pro- <br /> jects, economic development, city government funding for development, and <br /> City Council processes and projects. Results of the voting on topics <br /> e <br /> 10/10/79--5 <br /> ~3 <br />