Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />try to agressively work with Lane Transit District for park-and-ride facilities. <br />He noted some parking lots in the area possibly could become available for <br />park-and-ride. He wished the project would be redirected to get the people out <br />of their cars. <br /> <br />Huibert Paul, 4380 Pearl Street, stated that he is still opposed to this pro- <br />ject, as he was three years ago. Congestion is only during rush hour, not at <br />any other time. Very few trucks go through this intersection so they are really <br />not involved. He would rather see the money used to reduce the public debt. <br />He is not sure the City can afford its 10-percent portion at this time. More <br />must be done to discourage private automobile use. He feels there might be a <br />domino effect and they would have to widen other sections of Hilyard as well~ <br />He questioned the necessity for a traffic light at 30th and Alder, as he has no <br />trouble crossing there. He said there might be more pedestrians using that <br />intersection when the bus stop and turn-around were installed. <br /> <br />Sandra Merrigan, 435 East 31st Avenue, lives within one-half mile of the pro- <br />posed project. She feels the EIS has misrepresented the type of residents who <br />would be affected by this street widening. She said low-income and senior <br />citizens will be suffering from this. It will be more difficult for senior <br />citizens and handicapped people to patronize local businesses when they have to <br />cross a wider street. It is much more difficult to cross a four-lane than a <br />three-lane street. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Debra McMillan, 115 East 31st Avenue, encouraged park development and the <br />traffic light at 30th and Alder. She said that there would be a bottleneck <br />between 25th and 28th avenues in the plan. She said she does not like this <br />expensive plan which encourages automobile use rather than alternative modes. <br />She thinks it1s good for people to have to wait a bit as that miqht cause them <br />to think before they use their automobiles and use the bus or bicycles instead. <br />There could be signs which say "Yield to the Bus." <br /> <br />Susan Choppy, 400 East 32nd Avenue, said she is most concerned with the safety <br />factor of the widening. She said she feels that auto traffic will be encouraged <br />with this plan and the money could be better used. <br /> <br />Paul Harrison, 400 East 32nd Avenue, said he was here to oppose this project <br />three years ago when there were 80 people in opposition. There is no public <br />support for this project, he said. He felt the plan was essentially the same <br />except that 29th has been vacated and amenities added. He distributed an <br />information sheet which he wished to have entered into the record. Patterns of <br />traffic are going to change and plans should be made with this in mind. He <br />referred to the sheet he distributed entitled "Isn1t There a Better Way?" which <br />contained the following suggestions: improved bus service, pedestrian and <br />bicycle facilitation; park. development; noise abatement; berms at least 20 <br />feet high would need to be installed for exhaust from trucks; the development <br />should be in phases; and development charges to recover the cost of the project <br />should be passed along to the residential expansion that will be served by this <br />project. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/24/80--3 <br />