Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- with no sales or utility taxes. Also, in California, the proportion of govern- <br /> ment funded by property tax is much lower. The lack of an existing surplus in <br /> Oregon, combined with no other taxes, would make for a very difficult situation. <br /> He introduced Paget Engen, Policy Analyst, to provide background information. <br /> Ms. Engen stated that in the councilors' packets, they received calculations <br /> of what this measure would cost in revenues. Tonight, during Open House, <br /> a one-page flyer was available showing the impact on City services. Ballot <br /> Measure 6 would limit choices of services. It is a constitutional amendment and <br /> cannot be changed by the Legislature. It covers all classes of property, not <br /> just principal residences. Sixty percent of those properties taxed are income- <br /> producing properties. This would not replace the six-percent limitation, but is <br /> an additional limitation. If passed, it would be effective July 1981. If this <br /> measure was in effect in 1980-81, Eugene would have lost about $11 million, <br /> 83 percent of the property tax levied. This would be a cut of about 35-40 <br /> percent in general operating revenues and 300-500 positions would be cut from <br /> existing City staff. Unemployment benefit costs would be substantial. <br /> Ballot Measure 6 distinguishes between essential and other services. Police and <br /> fire services, deemed to be essential, would be supported at the 1977-78 level, <br /> and other services would need to be cut by one third before police and fire <br /> services could be cut further. Since 1977-78, the City of Eugene has annexed a <br /> good deal of land, the population has grown, and inflation has been a large <br /> factor. This would riot allow for a reasonable level of service in comparison <br /> with 1977-78. A majority of police services would be emergency services, and <br />e resources for other services such as crime prevention would have to be pulled <br /> away to cover situations that were emergencies. A 35-percent cut in the Police <br /> Department's Patrol Division would only allow for 6-8 officers in the field two <br /> thirds of the time and ten officers during critical times. The police would <br /> continue to respond immediately to priority 1 calls, which are those with <br /> continued harm to life or property. Priority 2 calls might be delayed for up to <br /> 40 minutes. Criminal intelligence would be deleted. The Detective Division <br /> would need to cut back services. <br /> The Fire Department would be similarly affected. There are eight fire stations <br /> now, with a ninth being added, but the City would only be able to operate five <br /> of the nine for the amount of money received in 1977-78. They would either <br /> close stations or reduce their status to satellite stations and maintain ser- <br /> vices to dense and industrial areas. In less densely populated areas, response <br /> time could take up to ten minutes instead of the four-minute average response <br /> time now. If police and fire services are cut, that would mean a 50-percent cut <br /> in all other departments. If the voters pass this, it means they do not want <br /> services they are now receiving. She added that it would take approval of two <br /> thirds of the voters to pass any additional tax. <br /> In regard to other cuts, Ms. Engen stated that although the Public Works <br /> Department budget is largely fee supported, such as with building permits, a <br /> large portion of their budget is for operating. Installation and maintenance of <br /> traffic signals, leaf pickup, sidewalk and street repair, traffic safety programs, <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 27, 1980 Page 2 <br />