Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> is very controversial. Supporters have indicated they would provide $20,000 to e <br /> help construct this path. Property owners are against the project. The Master <br /> , . Any change in the route <br /> Bikeways Plan includes the route that is objected to. <br /> would need to be considered by the PlanninQ Commission. If the Bicycle Committee <br /> recommends the present route, the question of land acquisition will come before <br /> the cbuncil and they could make a decision at that time. <br /> M~. Lieuallen asked if this route is in the Master Plan. Mr. Henry responded <br /> that it is and that it is partly paved already. Mr. Lieuallen asked if this is <br /> part of the original plan or if it was an amendment. Mr. Henry indicated that <br /> this was included when the Spy Glass Subdivision was developed. Jim Croteau, <br /> Planning, stated that when one phase of the Oakway development went in, to the <br /> west of Greenview Street, a portion of the bike path was secured. Mr. Hamel <br /> asked how many councilors are in favor of this path. He asked if the route now <br /> being considered is just a short cut. He stated that this would go by new <br /> houses. He asked about the original route that had been considered. Mr. Henry <br /> stated that this item would be referred to the Bicycle Committee. <br /> E. Budget Committee Appointment <br /> Mr. Haws stated that Jim Ellison, representative to the Budget Commmittee from <br /> Ward 6, was appointed to the Budget Committee to fill in the unexpired balance <br /> of a three-year term which will expire at the end of this calendar year. <br /> He has indicated he is willing to continue serving on this committee for one <br /> more year to complete a single three-year term. Mr. Haws stated that Mr. <br /> Ellison has done an excellent job and would recommend that the council reappoint <br /> him to the Budget Committee. e <br /> Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to reappoint Jim <br /> Ellison to the Budget Committee. Roll call vote; motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> F. Council Meeting--November 10, 1980 <br /> Mr. Obie expressed concern at having both the Performing Arts Policy Statement <br /> and user fees and the smoking ordinance on the same agenda. He feels there may <br /> not be enough r.oom for everyone in the Council Chamber and suggested that <br /> perhaps either the location or the agenda could be changed. <br /> Mr. Henry stated that he also has been concerned and some items have been <br /> removed from the agenda. However, very few meetings will be held in November, <br /> and only one evening meeting will be held. He is more concerned about the <br /> time requirements than about the number of people. The Performing Arts Center <br /> matter is scheduled first, leavinq time for the smoking ordinance, so perhaps <br /> the first half of the smoking ordinance testimony could be finished by 9:15, and <br /> the remainder by 10 p.m. Mr. Obie suggested that perhaps the Performing Arts <br /> Center matter could be scheduled first and the smoking ordinance scheduled at <br /> 8:30. Mayor Keller agrees that there is a problem and asked if either item <br /> could be moved to a Wednesday meeting. Mr. Henry indicated that is up to the <br /> council, but that staff felt it could not be done. He would suggest that the <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 5, 1980 Page 2 <br />