Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Drapela stated that this letter from EWES contains different terms from <br /> those contained in the information presented at the November 17 meeting. In <br /> view of this, he would suggest that this new information be presented to the . <br /> Joint Parks Committee and the item be returned to the council in a month with a <br /> recommendation. Ms. Smith noted that in view of this new information, it would <br /> be inappropriate for the council to act at this time. Mr. Delay asked if there <br /> has been miscommunication or if the EWES position had changed. Mr. Drapela <br /> stated that it was miscommunication. There are options that need to be explored, <br /> as this would be a major decision. Ms. Smith suggested that this could be <br /> placed on an agenda as a public hearing in the future. Ms. Schue stated that <br /> she had been receiving written materials from the neighborhood and feels it <br /> would be good to have a public hearing. Council consensus was to schedule this <br /> item for a public hearing on January 26. Ms. Smith stated that she hoped people <br /> would understand the reason for the delay. <br /> IV. ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING MANDATORY WEATHERIZATION STANDARDS FOR EXISTING <br /> RESIDENCES--INITIAL PRESENTATION (memo, ordinance distributed) <br /> Mr. Henry stated that this will be a preliminary presentation and it will be <br /> followed by a public hearing on December 22, 1980. He introduced Greg Page, <br /> Technology Coordinator, and Jean Reeder, EWEB, to provide additional information. <br /> Mr. Page stated that the proposed ordinance represented a great amount of work <br /> done by the public and-the EWES staff, and this effort addresses goals of the <br /> council. The program originally began on August 8, 1979, when Councilor Schue <br /> had asked to have an energy conservation program developed. Keith Parks, <br /> General Manager of EWES, was invited to talk with the council at their fall, . <br /> 1979, goals session. He had stated that there is a probability of electrical <br /> shortages within the next decade, and there is a need for conservation. He <br /> does not feel that voluntary efforts are working well enough. However, he <br /> informed the council that EWEB lacks police powers. Later, at the goals session, <br /> the City Council had voted energy conservation as their number one priority, and <br /> the Energy Conservation Policy Board was developed. On this board, the council <br /> was represented by Ms. Miller and Mr. Obie, the Planning Commission was repre- <br /> sented by Adrienne Lannom and Eleanor Mulder, and Camilla Pratt represented the <br /> EWES Board to develop an energy conservation program and bring it back to the <br /> council by the end of this year. The Policy Board had begun meeting in the <br /> spring of 1980. The energy supply and cost of energy had been discussed and it <br /> was determined that energy conservation is the cheapest way to provide additional <br /> energy. Also, conservation is the least disruptive to the environment. They <br /> examined the potential effects on the community and it was determined that <br /> shortages would affect the industrial sector first because of the State's <br /> curtailment program. Programs for use of solar energy in new PUD's and subdi- <br /> visions were developed. They helped the City and County to develop a small <br /> program enabling them to receive grants. Weatherization of existing residences <br /> would regulate homes built before July 1, 1984, when the State added insulation <br /> to their code and pre-empted local regulations. Staff worked with EWEB, remo- <br /> delers, and individual groups such as BEEP and Whiteaker Neighborhood. The <br /> information was presented at two public hearings in the spring, and was circu- <br /> lated through the neighborhood groups. Good feedback was received. In August, <br /> . <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 17, 1980 Page 4 <br />