Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ----- <br /> Ms. Wooten stated that these are strong proposals but the City could choose not <br /> e to accept these even if they were awarded. Ms. Schue added that the L-COG board <br /> has not taken a specific position but the L-COG board is supportive of the <br /> committee, although they have not supported these specific proposals in their <br /> request. Ms. Wooten clarified that the L-COG staff is in support, although <br /> there has been no official position from the board. <br /> Ms. Miller asked what the regional total of the award would be. Mr. Page stated <br /> it would be $500,000. L-COG is submitting a grant on its own, and these appli- <br /> cations will be separate. Ms. Miller stated she feels that staff should proceed <br /> with these applications and council can get more information later. She said <br /> that this will not be the City's major effort for conservation as these funds <br /> are intended for research and small target projects. There should be substan- <br /> tially more money later. Mr. Page responded that the City is trying to receive <br /> grant funds for two ideas which seem to make sense. Ms. Smith added that the <br /> council could request that more information be sent to them. Ms. Wooten added <br /> that these projects will be subcontracted. Ms. Smith stated she would like <br /> information on the funding situation along with other information. Mr. Page <br /> responded that he would provide this to the council. Mr. Obie suggested holding <br /> this item over and placing it on the August 12, 1981, agenda. Council consensus <br /> was to do this. <br /> C. Boundary Commission <br /> Ms. Wooten stated that the Boundary Commission Advisory Committee is considering <br /> a budget supported by fees and assessments of local jurisdictions. They will be <br /> meeting again Friday, July 31. She would like the council to authorize the <br /> e City's commitment to the committee of the assessments as outlined in order to <br /> maintain the Lane County Boundary Commission. <br /> Mr. Gleason stated that these funds would have to come out of contingency. <br /> He would recommend that this should be done. Failure to authorize the budget <br /> would mean there would be no budget for the Boundary Commission; therefore, no <br /> Boundary Commission. Ms. Wooten noted that she had voted to support the <br /> Boundary Commission yesterday and the assessments will be voted on Friday. She <br /> has asked the City Manager to look at alternate proposals for fees and assess- <br /> ments so that the issue of taxation might be alleviated. Mayor Keller noted <br /> agreement with Ms. Wooten's support of the Boundary Commission. Ms. Smith added <br /> that the council had taken an official position on this item through the Legis- <br /> lative Subcommittee. It is critical to retain the Boundary Commission. <br /> Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt and confirm the <br /> council's willingness to spend $18,750 in support of the Boundary <br /> Commission with a representative being authorized to forward <br /> council's position on this matter. Roll call vote; motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> Mr. Gleason indicated that staff would come back with a formal resolution <br /> transferring the money. <br /> - <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 2 <br />