Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Guenzler then discussed the status of the project, referring to a chart <br />-- showing, for each of several project elements, the amounts already committed or <br /> expended, the amounts yet unfunded, and the amounts needed to complete essential <br /> components of the project. Reviewing these figures, Mr. Guenzler' stated that <br /> approximately $20 million is still needed to complete essential components. Mr. <br /> Guenzler then explained the priorities involved in funding the remaining compo- <br /> nents and the use of suggestions by the Department of Environmental Quality in <br /> establishing these priorities. <br /> Ms. Wooten congratulated the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission <br /> (MWMC) on their work to do the job needed with the limited funds available. <br /> Ms. Smith noted that Mayor Keller would be telephoning the Oregon Congressional <br /> Delegation to lobby one last time for Federal funds for the sewage facility. <br /> Mr. Guenzler said that it had originally been thought that the construction of <br /> the plant would be completed before operations were begun. It is now recognized <br /> that construction and operations will be happening at the same time. For this <br /> reason, both staff and the MWMC believe it is important to begin immediate <br /> planning for operation of the plant. <br /> Mr. Guenzler referred to an executive summary of recommendations, dated July 31, <br /> 1981, which contained a report from the Eugene and Springfield Public Works <br /> departments to the two City Managers. Mr. Guenzler said that a copy of this <br /> report would be sent to each councilor. He explained that the operation plan <br /> recommended in the report contains the following elements: <br /> 1. Reevaluation of collection sewer systems and decision on how to <br />e deal with excess water. <br /> 2. Determination of capacity allocation for each of the cities. <br /> Mr. Guenzler explained that a 75/25 percent Eugene/Springfield split <br /> of dry weather flow capacity was currently under negotiation. <br /> 3. Determination of priorities for remaining elements of the regional <br /> fac il ity. <br /> 4. Decision on who will operate the facility. The current proposal <br /> calls for the City of Eugene to operate the facility and for the City <br /> of Springfield to provide staffing for the MWMC. In this way, the <br /> commi ss i on and staff can be independent of the operator. <br /> 5. Implementation. <br /> Mr. Guenzler then discussed specific action which would be requested of the <br /> Eugene City Council at its September 16, 1981, meeting. He explained that these <br /> same requests had been made to the Springfield City Council. The requests <br /> included authorization of agreements on the operation, maintenance, staffing, <br /> and budget of the sewage facility. Mr. Guenzler explained that the impact on <br /> the City of Eugene of the requested action would be to assure the City 75 <br /> percent of the dry weather capacity of the new facility; to allow flexibility in <br /> meeting economic development needs by permitting treatment capacity to be dealt <br />e with on a regional basis; and to retain the MWMC as a regional decision-making <br /> body. <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 14, 1981 Page 2 <br />