Laserfiche WebLink
ten times a night with many train whistle blasts. She said this was interrupting her sleep and affecting her <br />health. She felt it was affecting property values as well, but she could not afford to move. She encouraged <br />the council to be vigilant in acting to mitigate this problem and to help bring livability back to her <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Kevin Matthews <br />, PO Box 1588, Eugene, president of Friends of Eugene, wished to comment on the work <br />session that preceded the regular council meeting. He conveyed the point of view of Friends of Eugene on <br />the minor code amendments. He averred that they were mostly minor, but a number of them represented <br />readjustments through a streamlined “low involvement” process. He thought staff was correct that the <br />minor amendments would not cause Ballot Measure 37 claims because he asserted that “virtually every one <br />of them was a liberalization” of development standards. He alleged that the amendments would create <br />increases in property values because they would permit development not currently allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Matthews thanked the council for its 6:1 vote in favor of taking a close look at the Stormwater <br />Acquisition Plan. He surmised from the discussion that there was a 65 percent overlap between the <br />waterways identified in the Goal 5 water resources process and the waterways identified by the stormwater <br />water quality process. He thought 50 percent more length of waterways were identified for stormwater <br />quality than was identified for Goal 5 quality. He felt it should be the other way around because the habitat <br />required clean water. <br /> <br />Mr. Matthews expressed appreciation for the City Manager’s fiscal discipline. He thought it brought up the <br />question of whether environmental stewardship was being conducted on a piecemeal basis while the City’s <br />fiscal stewardship was done on a very “sophisticated, robust basis.” He asked how the community could <br />move toward a “triple bottom line kind of sustainability concept.” He asked how the City could have <br />environmental budgeting that considered and understood the carrying capacity of its natural systems. <br /> <br />Council President Poling closed the Public Forum and called for questions and comments from the council. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman thanked everyone for their testimony. In response to Mr. Biggs, she wished to clarify <br />that the police union leadership attended all of the meetings she attended and were very collaborative. She <br />related that the subcommittee of the Police Commission had also spent an hour in discussion with the <br />union’s lawyer. <br /> <br /> <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> <br />A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br /> -September 12, 2005, Work Session <br /> -September 12, 2005, City Council Meeting <br /> -September 21, 2005, Work Session <br />B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br />C. Call for Public Hearing on Alley Vacation for the Urban Renewal Agency of the City <br />of Eugene (VRI 04-1) <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved approval of the Consent <br />Calendar. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 10, 2005 Page 2 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />