Laserfiche WebLink
City Manager Findings <br />in Consideration of Written Submissions <br />During the fifteen -day comment period, the City received 5 written comments regarding the <br />proposed amendments to the Public Passenger Vehicle Fee Schedule ("proposed Fee <br />amendments"). A summary of the continents received, and findings addressing the comments, are <br />set out below: <br />1. Four comments voicing concern about the proposed $10,000 TNC license fee, <br />stating that the fee is too high. These commenters want the proposed $10,000 TNC license fee <br />lowered. One comment states that the fee is too high and, therefore, favors the large/established <br />TNCs and that it will discourage entrepreneurship and will create monopolies. Two comments <br />state that a $10,000 TNC license fee will serve as a roadblock and believe that $1,000 is more <br />reasonable. The fourth comment states that the proposed TNC license fee is significantly higher <br />than the rate of similar sized cities in Oregon. <br />Findings. As a result of these comments, the adopted TNC license fee is $8,000 per year <br />and, to mitigate potential inequities, the current $100 per vehicle permit fee is capped at $8,000 <br />per year per company. <br />The addition of the TNC license fee addresses the administrative rule change to the vehicle <br />permitting requirements. Prior to the Public Passenger Vehicle Rule amendments adopted today <br />by Adnan Order No. 53-18-08-F, all vehicles -for -hire (both hailable and non -bailable) were <br />required to have a City -issued public passenger vehicle permit. The fee schedule was based upon <br />the prior rules, i.e., both hailable and non-hailable vehicles -for -hire were required to have a vehicle <br />permit that cost $100 per permit. That meant, for example, a public passenger vehicle company <br />with a fleet of 85 hailable vehicles paid $8,500 in annual vehicle permitting fees. Similarly, under <br />the fee schedule proposed to be amended, a public passenger vehicle company (such as a TNC) <br />with 200 non-hailable vehicles would have paid $20,000 in annual vehicle permitting fees. <br />Pursuant to the amended Public Passenger Vehicle Rules adopted today, only hailable <br />vehicles -for -hire are required to have a City -issued public passenger vehicle permit. Thus, unless <br />the fee schedule is amended, a public passenger vehicle company with 85 hailable vehicles will <br />continue to pay $8,500 in annual vehicle permitting fees, but a public passenger vehicle company <br />(such as a TNC) with 200 non-hailable vehicles would pay $0. The addition of a TNC licensing <br />fee mitigates the fee inequity between traditional taxi companies (that must obtain vehicle permits <br />at $100/vehicle) and TNCs (that are not required to obtain vehicle permits). <br />2. Comment stating that proposed $0.20 per -trip fee should not be adopted <br />because it unfairly burdens traditional taxi companies. A taxi company submitted a comment <br />stating that the per -trip fee creates additional administrative costs for, and unfairly burdens, <br />traditional taxi drivers because taxi drivers, unlike TNC drivers, accept cash. The commenter also <br />states that TNCs entry into the City's PPV market should not increase costs to taxi companies that <br />have been operating in the City for many years and annually paying the application, license, <br />Exhibit A to Administrative Order 53-18-09-F <br />Findings in Consideration of Written Submissions - Page 1 of 2 <br />