Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Carlson indicated that in the absence of other direction, staff would continue to manage the <br />fund as it had been doing. He noted that a verbal commitment of funds had been made. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor and Mr. Meisner indicated support for the motion. Mr. Meisner added he was unsure <br />how he would vote on the use of the funds when the Budget Committee considered the issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman also supported the motion. She thought it important the money be held pending the <br />completion of the Budget Committee's work on the fiscal year 2004 budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly determined from Public Works Director Kurt Corey that there were no binding <br />commitments on the money. He also supported the motion, pointing out the Budget Committee <br />process meant the money would only potentially be held up for two weeks. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson determined from Mr. Pap~ that the motion was not intended to stop the expenditures <br />of money that was already legally committed. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 6:2; Ms. Solomon and Mr. Poling voting no. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson referred to the monthly activity report from the Police Department, which <br />discussed the community's use of radar guns to monitor speed. She asked if the City was <br />sending letters only to first-time offenders. She was also curious about how the Police <br />Commission interfaced between such a volunteer program, the department, and the public, and if <br />the use of radar guns was discussed by the commission. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson expressed appreciation for those times the organization worked across <br />department boundaries to solve problems. She said she had requested information about the <br />issue of traffic safety from the Neighborhood Program, Public Works, and Police, each of which <br />was working on the problem. She was also impressed by the City's response to a neighborhood <br />hazard in Ward 8. She noted the frequent multi-department response needed to such events. <br /> <br />Speaking to Ms. Taylor's earlier concerns, Mr. Kelly recalled that Richie Weinman of the Planning <br />and Development Department had mentioned last year that Union Pacific Railroad might be willing <br />to contribute funds to the City so it could notify residents living near the tracks of pending <br />spraying. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly provided an update on the Region 2050 Project, a long-range planning process <br />examining the entire region. He reported on the focus groups conducted for the project and noted <br />the variety of opinion expressed among the smaller cities. He said that in addition to the focus <br />groups, 55 professionals from various governments, utilities, and school boards convened for a <br />workshop in March to discuss jobs and housing allocation through the region. He said that there <br />was considerable concurrence about issues among the workshop participants. Mr. Kelly said that <br />the Region 2050 policy board would review two alternative growth scenarios at its June meeting <br />prior to forwarding them to the public for review. <br /> <br />City Manager Dennis Taylor had no items. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey announced the birth of his grandson. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 12, 2003 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />