Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pap8 said he thought repealing the ordinance was a slap in the face to the members of the <br />Budget Citizen Subcommittee. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted her continuing opposition to the fee as well as her fear that repealing it would <br />not put it to rest. She preferred to see the Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce place the fee on <br />the ballot so the voters could have the final say. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman agreed with Mr. Green about the City's priorities in terms of its Road Fund <br />expenditures. She said that decisions not to fund maintenance and preservation had been made <br />for decades, and now the council was using the backlog to justify a new tax. She noted <br />Commissioner Bill Dwyer's suggestion that the City package its maintenance projects and then <br />request Road Fund dollars from the County. She wanted to find a way to allocate the City's <br />dollars to its highest priority, which is the maintenance of the existing transportation system. The <br />City could always go to the voters for new projects or request a gas tax to fund new projects as <br />long as it was protecting the City's existing investments. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated he would vote against the motion in the event of a tie. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for a second round of comments. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson suggested that LCOG could be the vehicle for discussion if the motion passed. <br />She hoped there was an opportunity for a regional discussion and wanted serious attention paid to <br />how the conversation was facilitated so that there was an outcome. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor thought the City had been close to a discussion with the County when it had rushed to <br />pass the TSMF. She hoped it was not implemented. She believed that a board majority indicated <br />interest in a regional discussion. She said that Mr. Green's points related to the City's priorities <br />were well-taken. The City should put maintenance first if that was its priority. She suggested that <br />the heads of each body convene a meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that he did not disavow the need for the funding by offering his motion. <br />However, to the extent that the community was focused on retaining the TSMF, it lost other <br />options and the opportunity for a regional community conversation about transportation funding. <br />He acknowledged the work of the Budget Citizen Subcommittee, which worked from a list of <br />several solutions and found a gas tax increase and the TSMF key elements to a funding <br />approach. He agreed with its recommendation, and said he feared losing the tool entirely if the <br />council continued to retain it at this time. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner suggested that the region could use a model based on the United Front to reach a <br />solution. He also liked the mayor's past suggestion that the three jurisdictions look past their <br />jurisdictional boundaries when considering maintenance funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Green noted that Commissioner Anna Morrison was also interested in a regional discussion <br />and would be supportive if she was convinced that the focus of the discussion was on <br />maintenance funding. He also noted that the board had not opposed the local gas tax increase. <br />Mr. Green believed that a vehicle registration surcharge was also possible given that Oregon's <br />surcharge was among the lowest in the country. He shared the mayor's interest in a maintenance <br />approach that transcended jurisdictional boundaries. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 13, 2003 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />