Laserfiche WebLink
Council Discussion <br />• Level of public participation on this issue not surprising; community has an enormous stake <br />in how the property is developed and used. The river is a unifying element. <br />• EWEB Board intends to address the disposition of its headquarters at an upcoming meeting; <br />the City will have 30 days from the date of EWEB's declaration of surplus to request <br />negotiations for the property and then five years to complete the negotiations. <br />• The community will want the council to have a discussion about whether to pursue <br />purchase of the EWEB building. <br />• Proposed development addresses all of the input received about pedestrian access, <br />greenspace, playground, water features, affordable housing, etc. <br />• The inclusion of natural gas infrastructure should be carefully considered in light of <br />increasing energy around climate goals. <br />• There is community support for including multiple and diverse food options in site plans. <br />• The location of the proposed development will have its own overlay plan so code <br />amendments will affect that site only. Current concept plan will be reconfigured as site- <br />specific decisions are made. <br />• As proposed, every parcel of development will address its own parking needs and <br />requirements. <br />• Council's direction to increase the number of affordable housing units maybe accomplished <br />in a number of ways, including adding to building height and width. <br />• The proposed For Rent apartment buildings would be eligible for a MUPTE; the affordable <br />housing development and fee -simple ownership townhomes would not; council should <br />decide ahead of time if it is willing to grant a MUPTE. <br />• Consideration should be given to view shed issues affecting neighboring properties and <br />businesses. <br />• Projected costs of next steps in development still being negotiated as part of project <br />agreement with Williams and Dame. <br />• Most important change to MUPTE criteria was to ensure that more housing will be built that <br />is affordable to working residents; reasonable to consider now whether MUPTE should be <br />used in this case. <br />MOTION AND VOTE: Agency President Clark, seconded by Agency Vice President Taylor, <br />moved to direct the Agency Director to explore options on expanding the number of <br />affordable housing units and possible public parking and bring back design options on <br />anticipated costs and proposed public investment. PASSED 8:0. <br />Mayor Vinis adjourned the Urban Renewal Agency meeting and reconvened the City Council meeting. <br />3. ACTION: Downtown Riverfront Local Improvement District <br />MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to order the <br />local improvements to be made and direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and <br />specifications for the improvements and to call for bids on the construction contract. <br />PASSED 8:0. <br />4. UPDATE AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Temporary Day Center and Dusk -to -Dawn Pilot <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz read a prepared statement about the growing crisis many in the <br />community are facing around housing and homelessness, and the City's efforts, in partnership <br />with the County, to identify and implement effective and humane steps that can be taken to <br />address this issue. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council October 22, 2018 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />