Laserfiche WebLink
developed it was possible to have a local improvement district by the next construction season. He would <br />provide the council was a memorandum on the status of design work. <br /> <br /> <br />B. WORK SESSION: Youth/School-based Services Local Option Levy <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced Recreation Services Director Renee Grube to present information on the <br />City’s role in providing access to after-school programs for children and youth. <br /> <br />Ms. Grube stated that the Bethel and 4J school districts had identified alternative strategies to address their <br />funding needs, but the City faced a dilemma as a significant portion of its after-school programs were <br />funded by the levy and other grant sources. She said the levy was established in recognition of the core <br />service gaps that existed in schools and youth programs and significant strides had been made over the past <br />four years in service to youth and families, especially those who had difficulty accessing services. She said <br />the new approach of asset development played a key role in addressing priorities such as reducing youth <br />violence and risk-taking behaviors, reinforcing in-school learning and student achievement and expanding <br />partnerships and collaboration with other youth service providers. She showed a video to illustrate the high <br />return on the community’s investment. She noted that Working City footage was utilized in creating the <br />video. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy commented that she was pleased to see the asset-based approach as there was a big difference <br />between trying to fix problems for youth and actually giving them the tools to be successful. She said the <br />Boys and Girls Club had recently reported it had received other financial commitments as a result of the <br />City’s financial contribution. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly echoed Ms. Piercy’s appreciation for the asset-based model and commended staff for their efforts. <br />He said there was no question the services were important, particularly those services that were not offered <br />in the marketplace or otherwise inaccessible. He understood the reason for the staff’s suggestion that the <br />levy not be renewed and concurred with the recommendation to move services into the General Fund. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to direct the City Manager to incor- <br />porate some or all of the City’s core youth services within the General fund rather <br />than through a local option levy by FY08. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked how the Fun for All sites were chosen. Ms. Grube said sites were selected because of a <br />large number of either low-income families or youth. She said locations were evaluated each year based on <br />the previous year’s attendance. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked why there were no sites in southeast Eugene and what was meant by “culturally <br />competent” staff. Ms. Grube replied that there were Fun for All programs at University Park and Amazon <br />Pool that served southeast Eugene residents. She said that culturally competent staff who were those who <br />understood services to a variety of cultures, provided services that were inclusive and were trained in making <br />services accessible to the entire community. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she was a firm supporter of the levy and youth services; the only area for improvement <br />was in the area of the arts as music and dance could be better incorporated into the menu of services. She <br />supported the staff recommendation to move youth services into the General Fund but might offer an <br />amendment to refer the matter to the citizen members of the Budget Committee for a review of services in <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 26, 2006 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />