Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Stewart asked if his colleagues had any ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest to disclose. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer indicated that he had a conversation with Rep. DeFazio regarding ramps, similar to <br />Mayor Leiken’s conversation. <br /> <br /> Introduction of Topic and Background Information <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman called for the staff report. <br /> <br />Heather O’Donnell, Associate Planner for the Eugene Planning and Development Department, provided the <br />report. She stated that the focus of the joint elected officials hearing was on approval of a Metro Plan text <br />amendment and a Willakenzie Refinement Plan text amendment for the Interstate 5 Willamette River bridge <br />project. She indicated that Attachment C delineated the project area. She explained that this was one of the <br />earlier steps in the process, among multiple steps. She said if the amendments were approved the project <br />details would be reviewed during other land use approval processes, such as the City of Eugene’s Willamette <br />Greenway Permit and Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zones and a Standards Review and the City <br />of Springfield’s 75 Foot Riparian Setback Review. She stated that the subject policies would be amended to <br />include an exception for the proposed Interstate 5 Bridge. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Donnell reported that Mr. Sonnichsen had submitted an email, copies of which were provided to the <br />Joint Elected Officials. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Donnell stated that the Planning Commissions of Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County had held a <br />joint public hearing and deliberations to consider the request and had voted unanimously to forward a <br />recommendation of approval to the Joint Elected Officials. She further stated that the Eugene City Council <br />was scheduled to take action on July 28; Springfield City Council was scheduled to take action on July 21; <br />and the Lane County Board of Commissioners planned to hold the third reading of the proposed amendments <br />on June 25 with a possible fourth reading to be held on July 30. <br /> <br /> Open Public Hearing <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman reviewed the hearing procedure. She stated that the purpose of the hearing was to <br />receive relevant testimony, arguments, and evidence presented regarding the amendments under considera- <br />tion and that testimony must address the approval. She said failure to raise an issue with sufficient <br />specificity to allow the City Councils and Board of Commissioners to respond would preclude the issue from <br />being raised in an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman opened the public hearing and called for testimony from the applicant. <br /> <br />Tim Dodson <br />, 3258 Northwest Countryman Circle, Albany, explained that he was the ODOT Project <br />Manager for the bridge project. He pointed out that the project would be constructed entirely in the ODOT <br />right-of-way. He reported that the Environmental Assessment document had been completed, but ODOT <br />needed the plan amendments approved before it could be signed. He said ODOT had hired OBEC <br />Engineering Consultants to begin engineering work and Hamilton Construction had been hired to be the <br />contractor. He related that preliminary design work was underway and they planned to select the type of <br />bridge on August 8. He stated that it was hoped that 60 percent of the design work would be completed by <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Joint Elected Officials— June 24, 2008 Page 2 <br /> Lane Board of County Commissioners and Eugene and Springfield City Councils <br /> <br />