Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Action: An Ordinance Concerning Noise Disturbances; Amending Sections 4.083, and <br />4.084 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and Adding Sections 6.750 and 6.755 to that Code <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: February 26, 2007 Agenda Item Number: 6 <br />Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Mike McKerrow <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5251 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />The Mayor and City Council held a February 20, 2007, public hearing on a proposed ordinance <br />addressing noise disturbances. This item is scheduled for action on the proposed ordinance, which <br />includes restrictions on use of leaf blowers, standards for commercial and industrial noise in residential <br />neighborhoods, and more specific language about animal noise. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The City Council in 1996 discussed noise pollution generated by leaf blowers and similar equipment, <br />but did not adopt a ban or restrictions on noise and use. More recently, in August 2006, the council <br />again discussed leaf blowers and mulch blowers. There was not a majority vote during that work <br />session to ban leaf blowers. However, council asked staff to prepare an ordinance restricting leaf blower <br />use, and to look at existing noise disturbance regulations for potential gaps. <br /> <br />Before the revised land use code was adopted in 2001, Eugene included performance standards for <br />sound emissions in Chapter 9 (Land Use). Enforcement was handled by the Planning and Development <br />Department. These standards were eliminated with the code update, though some standards remained <br />for properties in the Natural Resource Zone. Other regulations on noise disturbances remained in <br />Chapter 4, and continued to be administered by the Eugene Police Department. However, noise <br />pollution is a lower priority for Police enforcement, with most police responses limited to amplified <br />music and similar disturbances. <br /> <br />The ordinance that has been proposed would split noise disturbance regulations between Chapters 4 and <br />6 in the City Code, and assign enforcement responsibilities for certain provisions to the Planning and <br />Development Department. In the weeks leading to the public hearing, staff received inquiries and <br />comments on the following: <br />Animal noise - Eugene Code now prohibits “Keeping any animal which frequently or for a long <br />? <br /> <br />duration makes vocal or other sounds so as to create a noise disturbance.” The proposed <br />ordinance adds language setting a threshold of 15 minutes of continuous noise. There have been <br />suggestions that existing code and enforcement practices, as well as the proposed language, are <br />either too liberal or too restrictive. <br />Commercial and industrial sounds - The proposed ordinance would restrict the sound levels from <br />? <br /> <br />commercial and industrial noise within residentially zoned properties. There has been some <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070226\S0702266.doc <br /> <br />