Laserfiche WebLink
o Councilor Yeh- said ADUs were not the cure-all or the curse of the city, but the issue <br />pointed to different land use philosophies; said she thought it reasonable that land owners <br />on alleys, even if there are few of them, should have the same rights to develop their land as <br />people on street -front lots; expressed disappointment about the conversation. <br />o Councilor Pryor - noted that the conversation was symbolic; said he was invited by LUBA to <br />sit on the advisory body to create the rules for HB2001; supported taking a proactive <br />approach to shaping the impact of the law. <br />o Councilor Semple - asked how many more alley lots could be created; asked about parking <br />requirements in alleys; said she thought future appeals and caselaw would give guidance; <br />voiced concern about the impact in the university neighborhood, especially on historic <br />buildings; supported moving on to the issues presented by HB2001, including <br />neighborhood outreach. <br />o Mayor Vinis -asked for clarification on the number and location of alley access lots in R-1. <br />VOTE: FAILED 3:4, Councilors Clark, Taylor, Semple and Zelenka opposed. <br />MOTION: Council Yeh, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to direct the City <br />Manager to revise the draft ordinance to remove the barriers to above -garage ADUs <br />in the AG, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and S-E zones by adjusting the standards for ADU <br />building height and interior setback. <br />o Councilor Yeh -said she thought building ADUs above garages was challenging under <br />current code and utilizing an already -existing footprint to build one would be desirable. <br />o Councilor Semple -supported adding a second level to a garage; asked for clarification <br />about interior setbacks. <br />o Councilor Clark- supported the motion because it did not alter the footprint; supported <br />requiring onsite parking for the above -garage ADU. <br />o Councilor Zelenka - said he thought motion would increase density and result in privacy issues; <br />asked about provisions for screening and windows that would remedy privacy concerns. <br />o Councilor Semple - asked for clarification about why a resident could not build a two-story <br />ADU under current code. <br />o Councilor Taylor - said she thought the motion required more thought because of threats to <br />privacy. <br />VOTE: PASSED 6:1, Councilor Taylor opposed <br />MOTION: Councilor Yeh, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to direct the City <br />Manager to revise the draft ordinance to remove barriers to ADUs on sloped lots in <br />the AG, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and S-E zones by adjusting the standards for ADU building <br />height and interior setback. <br />o Councilor Yeh - said she hoped to remove a common barrier to building ADUs for anyone <br />who owned a sloped lot. <br />o Councilor Semple - supported the motion and thought it would open up more lots to ADUs. <br />o Councilor Clark- asked what the steepest allowable slope would be; asked for clarification <br />on whether there would still be a height restriction; said he thought the motion would have <br />a detrimental impact on neighborhood parking. <br />o Councilor Zelenka - asked for further clarification about the height restriction. <br />o Councilor Taylor - said she thought council should be more aware about the reasons there <br />were restrictions on slopes and get the neighborhood associations involved. <br />MINUTES — Eugene City Council October 23, 2019 Page 3 <br />Work Session <br />