Laserfiche WebLink
• Councilor Clark- expressed concern that randomizing speakers for Public Forum would <br />still result in limiting newer voices who did not get the chance to speak to council; preferred <br />limiting each speaker to 15 minutes per year. <br />• Councilor Pryor - was supportive of a 60-minute Public Forum, given that it was longer <br />than any other city, including Portland. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - noted Eugene's Public Forum was more than twice the length of any <br />other city; thought the repetition of speakers was not contributing to more knowledge and <br />was getting in the way of council's business. <br />• Councilor Yeh - thought the repetition of the same speakers was the biggest problem; was <br />supportive of a 90-minute forum, but not a 60-minute forum; thought council's need for <br />more work time was not necessarily due to the length of Public Forum. <br />• Mayor Vinis - noted that 90 minutes was enough time for 45 speakers and that the <br />upcoming discussion regarding randomization of speakers may be the time to address other <br />issues. <br />• Councilor Semple - thought limiting the speaking time to two minutes would still result in <br />an overall reduction in Public Forum time; voiced concern about limiting accessibility to <br />council; said she planned to make a friendly amendment for 90 minutes; the friendly was <br />not accepted. <br />• Councilor Clark- said council was very accessible to the public compared to legislative <br />bodies of its type and size; thought Public Forum had become about performance rather <br />than sharing new information and ideas with council. <br />• Councilor Taylor - was supportive of a 90-minute Public Forum; thought one of the <br />purposes of public forum was for people to talk to the community; opposed a 60-minute <br />Public Forum. <br />• Councilor Pryor - did not think Public Forum should be an opportunity for community <br />members to speak to one another or provide entertainment for themselves or each other; <br />agreed with Councilor Yeh that one of the problems was with the small number of speakers <br />who came repeatedly and said he would be willing to have a 90-minute Public Forum as <br />long as there was a variety of speakers making testimony that was effective, appropriate <br />and addressed to City Council. <br />• Councilor Semple - was concerned about free speech issues; questioned how limiting time <br />would deal with repetitive speakers or those who wanted to entertain. <br />MOTION TO AMEND and VOTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Yeh, <br />moved to amend the 60-minute Public Forum limit to 90 minutes. PASSED 5:2, <br />Councilors Clark and Zelenka opposed. <br />VOTE on AMENDED MOTION (with friendly amendment): PASSED 7:0 <br />Mayor Vinis reminded council of the third motion on the table from the previous work session <br />regarding randomizing the order of speakers at Public Forum. <br />MOTION: Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to randomize the <br />order of people speaking once they've signed up. <br />Council Discussion <br />• Councilor Clark- asked for clarification on how randomizing of speakers might work; <br />expressed concern about the motion not addressing the lack of variety of speakers. <br />• Councilor Taylor - opposed the proposal to randomize speakers' names. <br />• Councilor Zelenka - thought randomization would help with some of the equity and <br />"gaming the system" issues; said the entertainers and repetitive speakers were still a <br />MINUTES - Eugene City Council January 15, 2020 Page 2 <br />Work Session <br />