Laserfiche WebLink
front could meet that need. Mr. Hinkley pointed out that the retention of on-street parking <br />avoided the construction of off-street parking. <br /> <br />Responding to testimony regarding on-street parking, Mr. Kelly said that the challenge to the City <br />was balancing different goals, one goal being to support convenient access to retail uses, one <br />goal being to provide for alternative modes of transportation, and another goal being to provide <br />for dense growth. He asked if the City had mechanisms to move parking toward closely adjacent <br />off-street locations, or alley-entrance parking lots. <br /> <br />2.CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br /> A. Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions of February 9, <br /> 1999 <br /> <br /> B. Approve Council Minutes of November 25, 1998 <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to approve the Consent <br /> Calendar. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly asked that item A be pulled from the Consent Calendar. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated that Ms. Taylor asked that the last sentence in paragraph 3 on page 3 of <br />the November 25, 1998, be replaced by the following: "She said that she liked Representative <br />Peter DeFazio but that if anything was named for him it should be after he dies or leaves office." <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was no objection to the proposed change. <br /> <br /> The minutes of November 25, 1999, were approved as revised, 6:0. <br /> <br />The council returned to item A. Mr. Rayor maintained that there needed to be more discussion <br />regarding the council's federal priorities. He wanted to ensure that passage of the minutes did <br />not constitute approval of the federal priorities. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to ratify the minutes of the <br /> Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations of February 9, 1999. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rayor moved, seconded by Ms. Taylor, to amend the motion by <br /> eliminating the federal priorities until the entire council could consider the <br /> priorities. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said that he was primarily concerned about the parking mitigation for the federal <br />building, and he would prefer to focus on site review and other enhancements to downtown <br />besides parking. In addition, there was considerable discussion of Bus Rapid Transit in the <br />priorities, and the document could be held up as the council's approval of the concept. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson pointed out to Mr. Rayor that the federal priorities were not only the City's, but the <br />City's intergovernmental partners; for example, Bus Rapid Transit was a Lane Transit District <br />priority that fit the City's goal of compact growth and alternative modes. City goals were often <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 22, 1999 Page 2 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />