Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rayor asked who was responsible for downtown parking. He said that the Budget Committee was <br />interested in making the City's parking effort a true enterprise zone. He questioned why there were private <br />parking garages in Portland but not in Eugene. <br /> <br />Mr. Green said that the board understood the City was in discussions with the GSA and asked that the County <br />be included in those discussions given that the project was going to impact the entire community. Mr. Torrey <br />indicated that was the reason he had contacted Mr. Green earlier. <br /> <br />Acting City Manager Warren Wong indicated that he had asked Lew Bowers of the Planning and Development <br />Department to take the lead on the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Bowers said that there is no required parking in the area. In parking-exempt zones, the City has <br />historically constructed structured parking to help provide the supply. That had not occurred in the 5th Street <br />area because it was outside the urban renewal district. He noted that the City had provided information to the <br />federal government about its analysis. Regarding the proposed design of the federal courthouse, Mr. Bowers <br />said that GSA held a design competition for an unspecified site. He distributed a copy of a design from the <br />selected architect, the Morphosis Group. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he would like to have a discussion to better understand what is going on with different sites and <br />the financial implications of the final site selection. He said that parking was an issue but he believed it was <br />easily solvable. His concern was with the character of the 5th Street area and the planning the City had done <br />for the area. He believed it might be possible to retain the character of the area if the courthouse was built, but <br />in the absence of any dialogue with the GSA he did not see how that would happen. He said that the City Hall <br />site seemed the superior site, but that raised questions about how much money could be available from the <br />federal government regarding reimbursement for improvements. Mr. Kelly also had concerns about the <br />potential costs to the public of the move of City Hall. He wondered if the public was so opposed to the 5th <br />Street site that it would support a bond measure to move services. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson referred to the cost issue raised by Mr. Kelly and said she was very concerned, particularly <br />since the voters just approved a parks and open space bond measure and a library measure. However, when <br />she considered the costs of retrofitting City Hall, she did not think the money would be well-spent because it <br />would not result in service efficiencies or service improvements. If the building was working well, she would <br />feel differently. The building did not work well and was not a good place for the police station and fire station <br />because of the seismic inadequacies of the structure. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson did not think a building on the scale of the proposed courthouse was appropriate for the <br />location selected. She believed that a consolidated city hall would serve the citizens best. A civic center could <br />be created around the new library given that the Atrium already housed City offices. She believed that would <br />realize both efficiencies and cost savings. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson hoped there would be a way for the federal government to reconsider its decision. She believed <br />that the council could make something good from the decision. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 22, 1999 Page 3 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />