Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson reported on a workshop she attended entitled "The Business of Government: <br />Banking on Productivity." She described a "productivity bank" established by Philadelphia, <br />Pennsylvania, and said she would like to consider a similar approach in Eugene. Ms. Nathanson <br />said that she had provided information about the workshop to the City Manager. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that the National League of Cities has initiated a project entitled <br />"Municipalities in Transition." She read a description of the project to the council and noted that <br />Eugene was one of 22 participating in the project. Ms. Nathanson anticipated that the <br />information resulting from the survey would help to focus the league's governing boards and <br />policy committee on issues, as well as inform participants what cities were facing, how they were <br />the same, and how they differed. She offered an example of the types of issues that were being <br />discussed, mobility and migration. Ms. Nathanson said that, after consideration, she had <br />concluded that Eugene saw issues differently than many other communities, but had some <br />commonalities with other cities that also have universities. She said that suggested to her <br />differences between communities were more attributable to environment than size. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Lee regarding national trends in local control, Ms. Nathanson <br />confirmed it was an issue for participants. She said that it was important that the issue be <br />addressed in writing instead of people merely complaining about unfunded mandates. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov suggested that the government school described by Ms. Taylor seemed <br />similar to Eugene's Police Academy, and the City might want to extend that effort in the future. <br /> <br /> II. LAND USE CODE UPDATE DISCUSSION <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey reminded the council that he had recommended that four independent groups be <br />asked to review the Land Use Code Update. He had made his recommendation because he had <br />heard many comments about how complex the update was and how the community could benefit <br />if the update received more scrutiny than was planned. Mr. Torrey said that often, the council <br />and staff were so involved with such projects that about the time they were beginning to feel <br />comfortable with the project the public was just beginning to hear about it. He hoped that the <br />recommendation would result in an intensive review from divergent groups who could reach out <br />to other sections of the community for feedback they could provide to the City in an organized <br />fashion. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr supported Mr. Torrey's recommendation, saying that he considered it one of the greatest <br />steps the organization had ever taken toward citizen involvement. He looked forward to the <br />results. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr left the meeting at 11:55 a.m. <br /> <br />Cathy Briner, Planning and Development Department, said that the Planning Commission <br />endorsed Mr. Torrey's recommendation with the caveat that the review would postpone the <br />adoption of the update through a period of heavy construction. The commission proposed to <br />meet with the council in late April; following that meeting, the commission would hold the public <br />hearings it had originally scheduled for February. Ms. Briner said that the commission also <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 14, 1998 Page 2 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />