Laserfiche WebLink
proposed ordinance, which provided for civil penalties of no more than $100. She said she was <br />also concerned that stereotyped opinions of homeless persons would lead to selective <br />enforcement of the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Randy Fix, 155 North 56th Street, Springfield, stated that he represented Emmanuel Outreach <br />Ministries. He said his organization supported the proposed ordinance as a short-term solution <br />to problems facing homeless persons. He said he would provide councilors with information <br />regarding the work of his organization and suggestions for long-term solutions to homelessness <br />problems. <br /> <br />Charles Gray, 256 North Grand, stated that he believed the proposed ordinance partially filled <br />the needs of homeless persons. He said additional provisions were needed for homeless <br />persons who did not own large vehicles, and that the City should lead by example to businesses <br />and nonprofit organizations in providing places for persons to sleep in automobile-sized vehicles. <br /> <br />Helen V. Liguori, 181 Westbrook Way, said that she supported the recommended ordinance. <br />She acknowledged that many citizens would not approve of provisions of the ordinance, but that <br />others would. She recommended that the City provide assistance for those involved in <br />homelessness to listen to the good in everyone. <br /> <br />Gary Malone, 5330 Cody Avenue, stated that he believed he was an average citizen and that he <br />supported eliminating permission for sleeping in vehicles on streets in industrially zoned areas. <br />He said he believed society was doing enough to feed and train homeless persons for work and <br />that those homeless who did not take care of their families acted irresponsibly. <br /> <br />Shelia Cameron, No Address Provided, stated that she was married to a Eugene Police Officer, <br />that she was a former dispatcher, and that she felt she was an informal spokesperson for other <br />families involved in public safety work. She said she believed it was unfair that police would be <br />required to enforce the proposed ordinance because it unfairly subjected them to harassment. <br />She suggested that councilors be held responsible for ordinances they enact. <br /> <br />Clayton Walker, Post Office Box 1338, stated that he represented the West Eugene Community <br />Organization. He said he believed key issues which needed to be considered in relation to the <br />proposed ordinance included (1) the safety of homeless persons and employees of businesses in <br />industrially zoned areas; (2) aesthetics; (3) holding businesses to different standards than the <br />rest of the community; (4) prohibition of camping by the City Code and Metro Plan; and (5) the <br />desirability of providing a central location for the management of the needs of homeless persons. <br /> <br />Danielle Smith, Post Office Box 11661, stated that she believed the ordinance was being <br />proposed because homeless persons were considered to have failed to meet expectations when <br />sleeping in vehicles in industrially zoned areas was permitted. She said homeless persons were <br />treated unfairly because of the lack of affordable housing and falsely accused of unlawful acts <br />because of their lifestyle and discrimination. She said she believed the proposed ordinance was <br />regressive and could lead to confrontations between citizens and police. She said that additional <br />time should be allowed for a transition from the current situation and that to be established by the <br />new ordinance. <br />Dominic Peralez, 341 East 12th Avenue, stated that he was not homeless, but lived in a vehicle. <br />He recommended that the council consider establishing a car camp. He described the <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council August 3, 1998 Page 3 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />