Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Taylor ascertained that if services were fully restored there would there be less need for <br />volunteers. Ms. Phelps said volunteers had always been used in delivering services but there <br />currently was no staff available to coordinate the activity to the optimum degree, adding that <br />using volunteers was an important way to build community. Ms. Taylor agreed that these types of <br />activities were community-building and more likely to instill citizenship. She said the program <br />should be added to previous services, not substituted for them. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said that substituting volunteers for staff was generally a good idea but their <br />effective use placed a demand on front line employees. He expressed concern about the <br />proclivity to bring in more coordinators and middle managers when the responsibility really fell on <br />front line workers. He said he would be more comfortable with the proposal if it called for only <br />one coordinator and more direct line staff to compensate for the added burden. Ms. Phelps <br />explained that direct services delivery is mostly done by temporary, part time people supervised <br />by middle managers/program supervisors who also deal with the demanding paperwork that goes <br />along with managing volunteers. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said the proposal seemed like a redesign of the original concept. She noted that <br />Option B-2 identified youth needing the services and plans activities for them, and a second <br />component expanded services. Ms. Nathanson said she assumed that program staff will invent <br />programs instead of just matching kids to services. Ms. Phelps said the council approved a half- <br />time special events coordinator to help support the program, noting that the idea was that the <br />position would work closely with the volunteer program. Ms. Nathanson noted that the end result <br />would be more activities being available for people. She wondered if contractual oversight could <br />not be handled by the central administrative function. City Manager Jim Johnson said the <br />Administrative Services Department had the capability for doing the legal minimum, but the <br />proposal provided an opportunity for doing a better job of that. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr expressed support for the program and thanked Ms. Nathanson for her contribution to <br />the proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said he believed in intergenerational partnership and it could be applied in many areas. <br />He said would raise the issue of more support for the Campbell Senior Center at another time. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said the council should approve both Option A and B, at minimum, and funding should <br />be explored through savings for legal services, or in the airport or administrative services funds. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor moved to adopt both Options A and B using contingency funds if <br /> money cannot be found elsewhere. The motion died for a lack of a second. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he could not support use of the contingency fund (one-time funds) for funding <br />ongoing programs. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee added his support for restoring services but said he preferred to address that issue in a <br />more comprehensive way through the regular budget process. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Laue, Mr. Johnson said there have been a series of add- <br />backs totaling approximately $150,000. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked to have a report in six months or a year on how the money used, along with <br />an assessment of the programs. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 5, 1998 Page 3 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />