Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit A <br />Administrative Order No. 58-21-15 <br /> <br />By Administrative Order No. 58-00-06, dated March 9, 2000, the City Traffic Engineer ordered <br />that Fairway Loop be closed to through vehicular traffic at a point approximately 300 feet south of the <br />centerline of Eastwood Lane. This partial closure was intended to address a significant number of <br />vehicles using Fairway Loop as a “cut-through” to the Oakway and Cal Young areas. Administrative <br />Order No. 58-00-06 was implemented by the City’s placement of a barricade (the “traffic diverter <br />system”) at a point approximately 320 feet south of the centerline of Eastwood Lane. The present <br />request is to modify the traffic diverter system by relocating the barricade by approximately 20 feet - to <br />a point that is approximately 340 feet south of the centerline of Eastwood Lane. This proposed <br />modification of the diverter system will allow full access to undeveloped Fairway Loop property while <br />continuing to restrict traffic on Fairway Loop. <br />The City of Eugene Administrative Rules at R-5.040TD, adopted in 1994 via Administrative <br />Order No. 58-94-09-F, set out the procedures and criteria for installing, removing or modifying a <br />traffic diverter system. Sections R-5.040TD-C and D of those rules pertain to a decision to install a <br />diverter system. However, the 2000 decision that directed the installation of the subject traffic diverter <br />did not appear to address the considerations for installation of a diverter system set out in R-5.040TD; <br />the 2000 Order appears to have addressed only the more general considerations at EC 5.055(a)-(n). <br />Section R-5.040TD-E of the Rules pertains to an application to remove or modify an existing <br />diverter system. In determining whether to approve a proposed modification to a diverter system, R- <br />5.040TD-E directs the Traffic Engineer to determine whether “the system as designed no longer meets <br />the criteria for initial approval.” R-5.040TD-E. Although the initial decision to install the subject <br />diverter system did not appear to address the Rules’ criteria for evaluating a proposal to install a <br />diverter system (at R-5.040TD-C-1.4), this decision to modify the diverter system does so, below. <br />1.4.1 Average daily traffic volumes. The proposed modification of the existing traffic diverter <br />will not affect average daily traffic volumes. The existing traffic diverter on Fairway Loop was <br />installed to restrict through travel and the relocation of the traffic diverter will continue to serve <br />the same function. <br /> <br />1.4.2 Traffic speed. The proposed modification of the existing traffic diverter will not affect <br />traffic speeds on Fairway Loop. <br /> <br />1.4.3 Street geometrics. The proposed modification of the existing traffic diverter will not alter <br />the street geometry. The existing traffic diverter closes Fairway Loop to through traffic. The <br />proposal will modify the traffic diverter by moving the closure point approximately 20 feet to <br />the south from its existing location to allow full access to the Fairway Loop property abutting <br />the partially closed street. The street section and associated geometries are the same in the <br />modified location as in the existing condition. <br /> <br />1.4.4 Percentage of through traffic. The proposed modification of the existing traffic diverter <br />will not affect through-traffic, as the existing traffic diverter closed Fairway Loop to all