Laserfiche WebLink
Courtney Jeffries, 3800 North Delta Highway, continued and concluded reading the letter <br />submitted by Deborah Jeffries. <br /> <br />Venessa Thompson, 110 South Garden Way, requested that Item 3E, dealing with <br />improvements to Garden Way, be removed from the Consent Calendar of the meeting and that a <br />public hearing be scheduled on the project. She said she believed there were errors contained in <br />the findings and recommendations of the Hearings Official and that her main concern was that <br />she was unable to understand what was to be done to the street in front of her home. She <br />described damage to her property and the street caused by construction equipment. She said <br />the interests of area residents were being ignored, trees were to be destroyed, and excessive <br />assessments were being planned. She said a public hearing would provide an opportunity for <br />her to better understand what was happening. <br /> <br />Ruth M. Bowers, 155 North Garden Way, said that she believed the minutes of the hearing <br />before the Hearings Official regarding proposed improvements to Garden Way were slanted and <br />contained inaccuracies. She recommended that their approval be removed from the Consent <br />Calendar of the meeting and acted on independently. She cited as an example of her concern <br />that attendance at the hearing represented a high percentage of abutting property owners, <br />whereas it was reported that only a small percentage of the number of property owners notified <br />attended. She also said the record of a statement she had made missed its point. She said she <br />believed holding a public hearing before the City Council was the only way to correct the errors <br />and provide additional information. <br /> <br />Jereme Grzybowski, 2766 Alder Street, stated that he had previously spoken before the council <br />supporting establishment of a Police Commission. He said that he was a Student Senator at the <br />University of Oregon. He said establishing a Police Commission was supported by a majority of <br />students at the university because it would improve relations between the student body and <br />police. He said he understood that the commission was not intended to deal with complaints <br />against officers, but that he believed it would provide a forum for discussion of concerns. He <br />said he believed students needed to have a voice on the commission. <br /> <br />Michael Olson, 2766 Alder Street, stated that he was president of the Student Senate at the <br />University of Oregon. He said he supported establishment of a Police Commission and the <br />appointment of a student member. He said that the student perspective on police affairs was <br />unique and could contribute to policy discussions. He suggested that Section 2.368 of the <br />proposed ordinance could be simply amended to include a college student, that it could imply a <br />student of either the University of Oregon or Lane Community College. He pointed out that <br />students of the two schools comprised approximately one-third of the population of the City of <br />Eugene. <br /> <br />Joel Hastings, 205 North Garden Way, requested that Item 3E be removed from the Consent <br />Calendar. He said he was concerned about the item because he believed that assessments <br />proposed for the road improvements involved were unfair, that the plan which had been <br />presented was vague, and that it was unclear whether new development in the area was carrying <br />its fair share of the cost of the improvement. He reported that the assessment on his property for <br />road improvements was estimated to be $20,000. He asked that a public hearing be held to <br />allow citizen input from area property owners. He characterized the proposed action as an <br />"uncaring process." <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 7, 1998 Page 2 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />