Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(ERAC). Staff met with ERAC five times between July 2004 and February 2005. On March 15, 2005, <br />staff met again with the Planning Commission to present issues and ideas highlighted by ERAC. The <br />Planning Commission expressed support for the general direction identified involving possible code <br />amendments to downtown-related regulations, with the understanding that further evaluation of these <br />topics was necessary. <br /> <br />The discussions at these public meetings were organized primarily around the following key questions: <br />1. Are the City’s zoning regulations for downtown aligned with Growth Management and Downtown <br />Plan Policies? In addition, are they easy to use, consistent and effective? <br />2. Are any changes required? If so, what direction should we be considered? <br /> <br />Based on the discussions held so far, it appears that most of the zoning regulations are working to <br />support the type of development desired downtown, and that an entirely new zone for downtown is <br />unnecessary. However, these discussions highlighted four areas where the City’s current zoning <br />regulations are difficult to use, conflict with adopted plans and policies regarding downtown, and <br />present a barrier to the type of development envisioned in the Downtown Plan. Specific issues <br />identified are outlined in the following discussion; solutions to address these issues will need to be <br />developed as part of the code amendment process. <br /> <br />1. C-2 Community Commercial <br />C-2 is the main commercial zone throughout the city, and is applied to approximately half of the <br />commercially zoned properties downtown. All properties zoned C-2 are required to have 60% of the <br />ground floor building street frontage in nonresidential use. Currently, the C-2 requirement cannot be <br />waived or modified through the Adjustment Review process. <br /> <br />While this requirement addresses the need to maintain commercial uses in areas zoned C-2, the <br />requirement was seen as overly prescriptive for property located downtown, and potentially <br />discouraging to residential development. Although commercial uses on the ground floor are desired, <br />the city currently has a substantial amount of vacant ground floor commercial space downtown. In <br />addition, adding nonresidential uses to a residential building changes building code requirements, <br />adding cost and complexity to the development. <br /> <br /> <br />2. C-3 Major Commercial <br />Approximately half of the commercially zoned property downtown is zoned C-3, Major <br />Commercial. Most of the properties zoned C-3 are in the Downtown Urban Renewal District, which <br />covers the commercial core of downtown. Surface parking within C-3 is limited to no more than 20 <br />spaces. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that undeveloped land is not used for surface <br />parking lots in the core of downtown. It should be noted that little vacant land exists downtown that <br />is zoned C-3, so the practical impact of this regulation is limited, unless existing properties are <br />rezoned to C-3 or buildings are razed on property currently zoned C-3. <br /> <br />Two issues were identified with this regulation: 1) the role that surface parking plays as an interim <br />use; and 2) the need for surface parking for activities that are highly desirable downtown. As an <br />interim use, parking areas downtown can essentially function as a land banking strategy. For <br />example, the U.S. Bank building is an eight-story building located on half its development site, with <br />the other half currently used for parking. This parking lot allows for potential development in the <br />future, as land values increase and parking is no longer the highest and best use. <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050912\S050912B.doc <br /> <br />