Laserfiche WebLink
42 on page 169, entitled Conduct comprehensive review of the city’s zoning map in conjunction with asset <br />mapping, be incorporated into Mixed-Use Centers. <br /> <br />Ms. Muir introduced John Lawless, Planning Commission President. Mr. Lawless expressed the apprecia- <br />tion of the Planning Commission for the opportunity to talk with the City Council. He invited the council to <br />call upon the commissioners when issues arose related to Planning Commission work program items, and <br />asked for “real-time” feedback that provided a venue for responsive communication. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless commended staff for its efforts in helping the Planning Commission, noting that the work of the <br />commission had moved smoothly and efficiently due to staff assistance. This resulted in the commission <br />being able to address more of the high-priority items on its work program. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless reviewed the commission’s high-priority Accomplishments. He noted the “Chambers <br />Reconsidered” public hearings had been very productive. They demonstrated a high level of cooperation and <br />collaboration with the citizens in the affected neighborhood. He noted that the Eugene Redevelopment <br />Advisory Committee (ERAC) recommendations for downtown had been a very collaborative process that <br />brought people with different perspectives together to collaborate and share their ideas. Both projects <br />occurred in a very progressive format that laid a foundation for future work. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless said discussions on the alternative path would continue, and it would be not only an alternative <br />path, but also a “path of discovery.” The Planning Commission looked forward to citizen, community, <br />business, and City policy input as alternative path recommendations were developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless introduced Commissioner Randy Hledik, who offered a briefing on two upcoming high-priority <br />items, Mixed-Use Centers (MUC) and the South Hills Wildlife Habitat Study. He said the commission’s <br />first objective was to complete a review of the Chambers MUC. He reported that there had been a high <br />degree of involvement from the Chambers Area Families for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAHFN), and noted <br />that the informal, final public hearing on that issue was held on July 26, 2005. The main themes that <br />developed from this process included: <br /> <br />? <br /> The degree of densification, at least in this neighborhood, and preservation of private open space <br />appeared to be the keys to preserving the neighborhood character. <br />? <br /> New tools that were locality-specific were being considered. CAHFN, staff, and the Planning <br />Commission were looking at a unique approach to regulating heights and setbacks in this process as <br />one example. <br />? <br /> Other neighborhoods were watching this process very carefully. It was premature to know if the <br />lessons that were learned from this process could apply to similar work in other neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Mr. Hledik said the commission would also look at the River Road/Rasor Park MUC, one of the original <br />eight priority nodes. The commission’s review would be a timely supplement to the River Road/Santa Clara <br />Transition Project provided the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) transportation growth <br />management (TGM) grant was approved. The project would start in late 2005 and be completed approxi- <br />mately two years later. <br /> <br />Mr. Hledik said the commission was also looking at the Walnut Station MUC. Although it was one of the <br />original 38 MUCs, because of other developments in the area, such as the Lane Transit District (LTD) Bus <br />Rapid Transit (BRT) station at the University of Oregon (UO), the construction of the federal courthouse, a <br />possible new UO basketball arena, and the potential for an I-5 bridge ramp, the area was ripe for commer- <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 27, 2005 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />