Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ORDINANCE NO. 19.1'1:S- <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD <br />METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN TO <br />REDESIGNATE PROPERlY IDENTIFIED AS MAP 17-02- <br />31, TAX LOTS 300 AND 700, FROM LIGHT-MEDIUM AND <br />HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LAND USE TO A COMBINATION OF <br />MEDIUM DENSIlY RESIDENTIAL, LIGHT-MEDIUM <br />INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES, AND <br />ADOPTING A SAVINGS AND SEVERABILIlY CLAUSE. <br /> <br />The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: <br /> <br />A. The City Council of the City of Eugene received a proposal from the City <br />of Springfield (Springfield Journal No. 90-12-201) for the amendment of the Eugene <br />Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) to change the land use <br />designations of 53 acres of vacant land identified as Map 17-02-31, Tax Lots 300 and 700. <br /> <br />B. This proposal came to the City of Eugene for action pursuant to procedures <br />described in the Metro Plan and Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 for amendment and <br />refinement of the Metro Plan, which requires joint hearings before the three Planning <br />Commissions and the elected officials of each jurisdiction. <br /> <br />c. The Lane County, Springfield and Eugene Planning Commissions reviewed <br />the proposal in separate work sessions prior to March 12, 1991. A joint public hearing <br />was conducted on April 3, 1991. On April 16, 1991, all three Planning Commissions <br />recommended that the application be denied. <br /> <br />D. The City Councils of Eugene and Springfield and the Board of County <br />Commissioners of Lane County conducted a joint public hearing on April 29, 1991. At a <br />public meeting held on May 13, 1991, the City of Eugene voted to deny the application <br />as proposed. At a subsequent meeting on May 28, 1991, the City Council reconsidered <br />the matter and voted in favor of the application. On May 6, 1991 the City of Springfield <br />voted to approve the application as proposed. At a meeting held May 7, 1991 the Board <br />of County Commissioners voted to deny the application as proposed. <br /> <br />E. The Metro Plan and respective Code provisions adopted by Eugene, <br />Springfield and Lane County provide that the matter be referred to the Metropolitan <br />Policy Committee for conflict resolution if the jurisdictions do not adopt identical <br />ordinances. The respective jurisdictions did refer the matter to the Metropolitan Policy <br />Committee to determine if conflict resolution was possible, and that Committee <br /> <br />Ordinance - 1 <br />