Laserfiche WebLink
M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />Council Chamber—Eugene City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> July 28, 2008 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Bonny Bettman, Betty Taylor, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, <br />Jennifer Solomon, Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Susan M. Truax <br /> said although she had patronized downtown businesses for many years, was involved as a <br />volunteer with the Eugene Celebration, and spent considerable time downtown, when she read the recent <br />article in The Register-Guard about the experience of Betty Snowden, she realized she did not know what <br />was going on downtown. She called the treatment of Ms. Snowden unacceptable. She wanted to participate <br />in a solution and was ready to act, including sitting down in front of Ms. Snowden’s business to demonstrate <br />support. She asked the council to give her direction. <br /> <br />Kathy Saranpa <br />, representing the Crest Drive Community Advisory Group, noted the council’s passage of a <br />motion calling for the Planning Commission to investigate the potential of reclassifying the street and said <br />she had since learned from City Manager Jon Ruiz and Public Works Director Kurt Corey that the council <br />could take that action without input from the commission. She asked the council to take that action. <br /> <br />Jim Torrey <br />, 3393 Arlington Avenue, spoke in support of the exclusion ordinance as a means to respond to <br />the racial harassment experienced by resident Betty Snowden and others. He thanked councilors Ortiz and <br />Clark for raising the issue. He acknowledged that the proposed ordinance might not be perfect but <br />suggested to do anything less was not acceptable. He believed that the offense of failure to appear was not <br />an acceptable approach. He noted the recent successful Olympic Trials and said the volunteer committee, <br />which he had chaired, had worked long and hard to determine how each visitor to Eugene felt welcome. He <br />asked the council to consider the impact the article about Ms. Snowden’s experiences in The Register-Guard <br />would have had on visitors had it appeared during the event. He did not think that the City could fail to deal <br />with the situation. He called on the council to take responsibility and deal with the issue or it would send a <br />message he did not believe the citizens supported. He said that “Justice delayed was justice denied.” <br /> <br />Zach Vishanoff <br />, a resident living on Patterson Street, questioned what prompted the council to change the <br />closing date for public comment for the University of Oregon’s arena project. He asked “what’s the rush” <br />and why the University could not wait until September. He raised the issue of a new dormitory proposed to <br />be built one block south of the existing arena, which would impact housing. He believed that too many <br />development projects were going forward at the same time. Mr. Vishanoff also noted a proposal to build a <br />new laboratory in the Riverfront Research Park and suggested that would have an impact on the arena <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Meeting <br />