Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Bjorklund said the GoalS inventory under consideration consisted mainly of water resources, including <br />wetlands, ponds, rivers, and streams. He emphasized the value of riparian areas and wetlands to maintain- <br />ing water quality, and said that healthy water systems provide humans with clean water and support wildlife. <br />Mr. Bjorklund reminded the council that water that passed through the community was used by other <br />communities such as Corvallis for drinking water, and the City's actions affected those individuals as well. <br />He noted the wildlife diversity in the community, saying that there were few major mammals other than deer <br />in the metropolitan area but other species, such as birds, plants, fish, and insects, were diverse and <br />numerous. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund discussed the GoalS process, noting that periodic review work program item was focused on <br />three resource types: 1) riparian corridors; 2) upland wildlife habitat; and 3) wetlands. He briefly described <br />the characteristics of each resource type. He reviewed the steps in the process, which called for the City to <br />map the resources, identify conflicting land uses, designate impact areas, analyze the Economic, Social, <br />Environmental, and Energy (ESEE) consequences, determine which sites to protect, and adopt and apply <br />protection measures. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund reviewed past key dates in the GoalS inventory process and key dates in the GoalS ESEE <br />process. He emphasized the considerable contact between staff and affected property owners over the past <br />few years. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund said that the council would consider adoption of the local wetland inventory and GoalS <br />inventory of significant wetlands, minor corrections to the riparian and wildlife habitat inventory, the ESEE <br />analysis and site recommendations, code amendments to create the \ WR Water Resources Conservation <br />Overlay Zone, and legislative changes to apply the \WR overlay. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund called the council's attention to a map on the meeting room wall that depicted corrections to <br />the inventory since 2003 made possible by more precise mapping tools and new information. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. With regard to significant riparian <br />areas, there were 950 total site acres in question and the commission recommended 886 acres for conserva- <br />tion. With regard to significant upland habitat, there were 177 total site acres and the commission <br />recommended 152 acres for conservation. With regard to significant wetlands, there were 619 total site <br />acres and the commission recommended 331 acres for conservation. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund reviewed the exhibits accompanying the ordinances before the council, noting that Ordinance <br />1 applied inside the city limits and Ordinance 2 applied to the areas outside the city limits yet within the <br />urban growth boundary. He said the Lane Board of County Commissioners would also have to adopt the <br />recommendations for those areas outside the city limits. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund overviewed the proposed GoalS regulations, noting they were based on regulations already in <br />place in the West Eugene Wetlands Plan area. He said they included flexible conservation setbacks for <br />protected GoalS resources. The flexibility included a setback averaging option and what he termed a <br />"reduce and restore" option that allowed a developer to reduce a setback in one area in exchange for <br />restoration of the remaining conservation area. He indicated that previously existing development was <br />proposed to exempt from the regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Bjorklund provided a Web site for additional information: www.eugeneNR.org. <br /> <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br /> <br />September 21,2005 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />