Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(Chambers /ND Overlay Zone) revealed a long-standing concern with City development standards by <br />residents of the area. Many residents perceived that the City’s development standards, particularly the <br />R-2 Medium Density Residential zone standards and multi-family development standards, were <br />responsible for new development that was incompatible with existing development and destructive to <br />neighborhood character. Many study area residents were skeptical of any increase of densities in the <br />neighborhood that did not address design issues and the impacts of new development on neighborhood <br />character and quality of life. The consultant team that worked on this project included Rowell Brokaw <br />Architecture, Ron Kellett from the University of British Columbia, and transportation consultants PTV <br />America. <br /> <br />The Chambers Reconsidered project represents a neighborhood-specific, responsive approach to mixed <br />use development planning that concentrates on resolving issues that limit public acceptance of the <br />mixed use development concept. A noteworthy element of this project is the amount of citizen <br />participation in the drafting of the final product. During the course of the study, a core group of area <br />residents, adopting the name Chambers Area Families for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAFHN), became <br />instrumental in shaping the direction of the study and the final product. The voluminous background <br />information, much of it produced by CAFHN, has been placed in the City Council office for review. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 28, 2005, and a second, more interactive <br />hearing on July 26, 2005. On September 26, 2005, the commission recommended City Council <br />approval of the attached draft ordinance. The City Council held a work session on this project on <br />October 12, 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Mixed Use Centers, or nodes, are an integral part of the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area’s growth <br />management strategy. Adopted policies support both the increased densities expected in the Mixed Use <br />Centers, as well as special attention to established neighborhood character, as reflected in the policies <br />below. The Chambers Reconsidered project attempted to find the appropriate balance in the area <br />affected by this proposal. <br /> <br />Adopted Metro Plan and refinement plan policies relevant to this project are discussed in the draft <br />ordinance Attachment A, Exhibit B. <br /> <br />The adopted Growth Management Policies have strongly influenced the direction and outcome of this <br />project. These policies are not standards or criteria to be applied to any specific decision. Rather, they <br />are guiding principals adopted by the City Council to advise staff and the City Manager of the direction <br />the council wishes to proceed with respect to growth. Applicable Growth Management Policies are <br />discussed below: <br /> <br />GMS Policy #1. Support the existing Eugene Urban Growth Boundary by taking actions to <br />increase density and use existing vacant land and under-used land within the boundary more <br />efficiently <br />. <br /> <br />The proposed amendments support this policy. The amendments provide for an increase in residential <br />densities in areas zoned S-C/R-1 and S-C/R-2 through new provisions for compatible development on <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M051114\S0511145.doc <br /> <br />