CC Minutes - 11/10/08 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

planting strips was too extreme and pushed the concrete footprint into existing front yards. She pointed out that there was a bicycle path with separate traffic lanes and eight access points two blocks south of Elmira Road. She related that residents would also lose their on-street parking unless they paid $650 per parking bay. She underscored that the majority of residents opposed the design as currently proposed. She opined that staff had not listened to the residents. Wes Palmer , 3320 Elmira Road, and his wife strongly opposed redoing the road. He averred that removing the mature trees would take away the appeal of their street. He said the mature landscaping had contributed to their decision to buy their house. He stated that the planting strips and bicycle lanes would take away the available parking. He related that even if they paid for a parking bay in front of their home they would still be losing parking capacity. He felt the mature trees gave the street a feeling of separation from the nearby industrial areas and property values would be lowered by their removal. He asked the councilors to help the neighbors maintain the unique appeal of their neighborhood. He added that the assessment represented approximately one-third of his annual income. He believed this was true for many of his neighbors. He felt it would be a burden in the face of a potential depression. His wife noted that one of their neighbors had been so opposed to the plan that he moved. Thomas Young , 3324 Elmira Road, said he had attended two meetings with City staff. He felt the staff had not listened “at all.” He did not feel he should have to pay for something he did not want in the first place. He was not against having road improvements but he believed current plans represented taking the maximum road allowance. He averred that the economic situation had changed and most of the residents were on fixed incomes. Laura Gillpatrick , 2350 N. Terry Street, #75 said, while she did not reside on Elmira Road, she was a member of the Active Bethel Citizens (ABC) steering committee. She related that the steering committee had voted to support the Elmira Road petition. She had spoken with many Bethel residents. She felt that continuing the discussion would empower residents. Kim Crieger-Goodwin , P.O. Box 2421, spoke in support of the expansion of the boundary of the Multiple Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) into the Trainsong neighborhood. She explained that she was a real estate agent; she had sold real estate and managed apartment rentals for 13 years. She related that her family had purchased a property on Aberdeen Street in the Trainsong neighborhood approximately ten years earlier. She said they wanted to create energy efficient, clean, livable multi-family dwellings with open space and garden space. She noted that it was an area with very few parks. She averred that the area’s potential for redevelopment was low as it would only support lower-priced rentals. She asserted that it was very difficult to break even on a project like that even if it was using federal support. She said the property her family owned was zoned R-4, residential. She related that quantity would help such a project break even but she did not believe high density development was practical given how much of the land would be taken up by parking and the building footprint. She wanted to develop something that would not be substandard housing. Carol Berg-Caldwell , 2510 Augusta Street, said her commentary in the Register Guard on the previous day primarily sought to commend the Eugene Police Department (EPD), the University of Oregon’s Department of Public Safety (DPS), and student groups for the successful pre-Halloween planning that had resulted in “far less tumult.” She recapped her commentary. She suggested that revenues from the approximately 248 citations for alcohol-related offenses issued on Halloween be allocated to youth drug and alcohol rehabilitation services. She also reiterated her concern that the police were not receiving adequate access to counseling. She felt the “psychic toll” on police due to what they witnessed in their work “must be immense.” She believed the City could avoid a certain amount of litigation if the police were less impacted by their work. She closed her comments by congratulating the Mayor on her reelection and commending MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 10, 2008 Page 3 Regular Meeting