Laserfiche WebLink
éé <br />Ms. Nathanson asked Mr. Pap to explain the rationale for his amendment. Mr. Pap believed that <br />if the City took the property off the market for six months, there should be a cost to the ownership <br />group. <br /> <br />é <br />Ms. Nathanson asked if Mr. Pap was concerned about the amount involved or the length of time <br />é <br />the property was off the market. Mr. Pap understood the ownership groups need for a period of <br />= <br />time for due diligence but thought there should be a fee associated with it, and that it probably <br />should be higher. <br /> <br />Although she did not intend to support the main motion, Ms. Taylor said the amendment made <br />sense and she intended to support it. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner indicated he would oppose the amendment and suggested that if anyone should be <br />penalized for keeping the property off the market, it should be the City for failing to deal with the <br />property for several years. He did not want to threaten what he considered a good proposal. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said the discussion highlighted a process problem in that the proposal was accepted <br />before due diligence was performed. She pointed out the staff resources the proposal would <br />require. Ms. Bettman said the ownership group should be willing to take the risk and show <br />commitment to its proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that the proposal before the council was the most thorough of the four the City <br />received, and if it was not accepted, it was not as though the City had another proposal that was <br />ready to go. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey indicated he would vote against the amendment if the vote was a tie. He wanted to <br />see the project move forward and did not want to lose the opportunity to realize the proposal <br />because of the amount of earnest money. <br /> <br />é <br />Mr. Pap offered a friendly amendment to his motion, which Ms. Bettman accepted, to change the <br />amount to $7,500 for the first two months and $15,000 for the remaining four months. <br /> <br />é <br />The amendment to the motion failed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Mr. Pap, and Ms. <br />Bettman voting yes. <br /> <br />The vote on the motion was 7:1; Ms. Taylor voting no. <br /> <br /> <br />B.ACTION: Resolution 4751 Establishing Hazardous Substance User Fees for the Fiscal <br />Year Commencing July 1, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />é <br />Mr. Pap, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, moved to approve Resolution 4751, <br />establishing hazardous substance user fees for the fiscal year commencing <br />July 1, 2003. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for council discussion on the motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon said as she researched the program she had become increasingly convinced it was <br />not the program the voters approved. Because of court decisions affecting the program, there <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTESEugene City Council March 12, 2003 Page 2 <br />C <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />