Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing: An Ordinance Concerning Solid Waste Administrative Powers and <br />Amending Section 3.250 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: June 8, 2009 Agenda Item: 4 <br />Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Kurt Corey <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-8421 <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />This public hearing is for the purpose of gathering community input on a proposed ordinance amending <br />Section 3.250 of the Eugene City Code dealing with Solid Waste Administrative Powers. The proposed <br />amendments would permit the establishment of a transportation surcharge on solid waste (garbage) hauler <br />collection revenue and require that the revenue generated from the surcharge be used for repair, <br />maintenance, operation and preservation of local streets. If the council approves the ordinance amending <br />the solid waste hauler code, the City Manager would adopt by administrative order a 5% transportation <br />surcharge on solid waste hauler collection receipts, effective August 1, 2009, with the revenues generated <br />from the surcharge dedicated to street services on local streets. <br /> <br />Following a public hearing on April 20, the council voted 5-3 on April 27 not to adopt an ordinance <br />establishing a solid waste surcharge, similar to the ordinance which is the subject of this public hearing. <br />In the course of the debate on that ordinance, several councilors requested that the full Eugene Budget <br />Committee be engaged in discussing the FY10 Road Fund issue in the context of broader City budget <br />issues. That discussion took place on May 18, where the Eugene Budget Committee approved on a 10-4 <br />vote the following motion: <br /> <br />“Move that the Budget Committee recommend that the City Council impose a 5% transportation <br />surcharge on solid waste haulers to generate an estimated $900,000 for road maintenance and <br />operations. All monies collected are to be designated to local streets for O & M. Should the City <br />receive any extra road funding from the state or other sources in the year 2010 budget cycle, that <br />money should be used first to offset the fees as a priority in order to rescind the surcharge.” <br /> <br />Based on that strong recommendation by the Budget Committee, this hearing is being held along with an <br />opportunity for the council to take action on the revised ordinance, which would restrict the use of the <br />revenue to providing services on local streets. The City Manager’s rationale for moving the decision on <br />this issue along in an expedient manner is to allow this matter to be resolved in advance of the public <br />hearing and action on the FY10 Adopted Budget, which are currently scheduled for June 15 and June 22, <br />respectively. The council’s ultimate decision on this ordinance will have a significant bearing on the <br />FY10 Road Fund budget and the level of street operations and maintenance services which the City will <br />be able to provide in the upcoming year. For that reason, it is important for the City Manager to have the <br />council’s decision on this proposed ordinance and the FY10 road funding issue by the time the FY10 City <br />budget comes to the council for formal adoption. <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090608\S0906084.doc <br /> <br /> <br />