My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/15/09 Joint Elected Officials
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 09/15/09 Joint Elected Officials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 2:17:03 PM
Creation date
11/16/2009 5:30:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joint Elected Officials Meeting Minutes <br />September 15, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />Ms. Barry said the Commissioners met on this item on September 3 and gave helpful comments <br />on what they wanted to see in the plan. Staff had tried to incorporate those ideas in this <br />document, such as more detail on the population forecasting process, that the Lane County board <br />would begin discussions on Metro Plan policy direction and that rural reserve concepts would be <br />included into the work plan. This work plan would evolve and further policy decisions and <br />direction could be incorporated, primarily work done by land management division that affected <br />transportation in the Metro area. She thanked the Commission for their direction. <br />Mr. Boyatt asked if there were questions or if they preferred staff went through the table. <br />Commissioner Sorenson asked about the nature of approval. He asked at what point this became <br />a policy issue and would require further decisions. <br />Ms. Barry said there would be an extensive public involvement process for items related to both <br />the work plan milestones and local and MPD planning activities. The jurisdictions would have <br />their own formal public hearings at which time they would be asked to provide policy decisions. <br />Mr. Boyatt agreed. Each of the jurisdictions still had the same policy decisions that they would <br />normally have. They would then determine how to bring the different priorities for jurisdictions <br />together. The work program did its best to identify when policy decisions were needed. <br />Commissioner Sorenson asked if they could give authority to staff to pursue this for only one <br />year to see how things developed. <br />Mr. Boyatt said the approval requested was to take the work plan to the LCDC who had the legal <br />authority to approve it or not. All of that was intended to meet that requirement in the <br />transportation planning rule (TPR) that our plans needed to be consistent. <br />Ms. Barry said they were required by the transportation planning rule to bring a work plan. <br />Commissioner Sorenson asked what would happen if they didn't like what staff was doing in a <br />year and didn't want it to continue. <br />Ms. Barry said they didn't feel the LCDC would support that as complying with the TPR.. She <br />noted that staff from the LCDC were in the audience. <br />Mr. Boyatt said if that was the collective will of the jurisdictions, staff could go to the LCDC <br />with a one year work plan. <br />Commissioner Sorenson asked how much money LCDC was giving the jurisdictions and how <br />much implementing the six -year plan would cost. <br />Mr. Boyatt said it was difficult to know how much it would cost and he wasn't aware of any <br />funding from the LCDC. There would be discussions with ODOT regarding what fair share of <br />state planning and research funds we could expect for this unfunded mandate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.