Laserfiche WebLink
<br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room—City Hall—777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> September 17, 2008 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, George Poling, Andrea Ortiz, <br />Mike Clark. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Alan Zelenka, Bonny Bettman. <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: <br /> <br />Low-Impact Development – Results of Review <br /> <br /> <br />Fred McVey, Public Works, reported on the results of a review of Low Impact Development (LID) practices <br />for stormwater management in Eugene. He said the purpose of the review was to identify opportunities and <br />barriers to LID, which he defined as a stormwater management and site development strategy that <br />emphasized use of onsite natural features to mitigate impacts of increased stormwater runoff and pollution <br />through practices and design techniques that infiltrated, filtered, stored, evaporated, reduced and detained <br />runoff close to its source. He said those practices included use of swales, rain gardens, green roofs, <br />pervious pavements and other impervious surface reductions and onsite tree and open space preservation. <br /> <br />Mr. McVey said key findings determined the City had a solid foundation in place to support LID principles <br />and a range of regulations and programs that supported the use of those practices. He said the City’s <br />progress in this area was substantial, but a variety of opportunities existed to increase the use of LID and <br />were detailed in the report, as were barriers to LID practices. He said the recommendation was to pursue <br />increased implementation through several avenues: administrative adjustments, additional integration of <br />LID practices with other initiatives, development of proposals for land use code amendments and proposals <br />for program enhancements. He said if land use code amendments were pursued, proposed modifications <br />should be developed within the framework of the Planning Division’s annual work plan and Planning <br />Commission priorities. He said policy questions related to whether LID practices should be required or <br />available as an option that was encouraged and facilitated and how best to balance LID with other council <br />priorities. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy noted that the report did not address trying to maintain the character of the neighborhood in <br />which LID practices were implemented. Mr. McVey agreed that maintaining neighborhood character might <br />be a benefit of LID, but the charge was to look at the issue from a stormwater management perspective so <br />that subject was not addressed. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy asked if LID practices were less expensive for the City in the long-term because there were no <br />curb and gutter maintenance requirements. Mr. McVey said that some financial analysis had been done by <br />other communities and in some cases it was less expensive to construct, operate and maintain LID <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 17, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />