My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 04/26/10 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:30:17 PM
Creation date
4/23/2010 11:03:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/26/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />McNutt Room – City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> January 13, 2010 <br /> 12:00 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, Mike Clark, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, Alan Zelenka <br />(via telephone), Betty Taylor, George Poling <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Jennifer Solomon <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called the work session meeting of the Eugene City Council to order at 12:00 p.m. <br />WORK SESSION: Adoption of Resolution 4998 Adopting Inflationary Adjustments to <br />A. <br />Systems Development Charges for Parks System, and Local Wastewater System, <br />Stormwater System and Transportation System; Superseding Administrative Order 58-08- <br />02-F; and Amending Resolution No. 4900 <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy noted that the work session agenda item regarding Eugene City Council Resolution 4998 <br />regarding systems development charges (SDC) had been carried over from the council’s January 11, <br />2010, regular meeting. <br />Assistant City Manager Sarah Medary introduced Assistant City Attorney Kathryn Brotherton. <br />City Engineer Mark Schoening reminded the council that Resolution 4998 had been carried over from <br />their January 11 meeting in order to get a better sense of the financial impact of deferment of inflationary <br />adjustments on SDC’s. He noted that a memorandum previously sent to the council regarding the SDC’s <br />showed a range of four local systems as well as the revenue that would be lost if the implementation of <br />the inflationary adjustments was delayed from April until July 1, 2010, and also from April until October <br />1, 2010. He stated that the range of the potential lost revenue was based on revenues received in 2009. <br />He further stated that the majority of the revenue losses from the four systems would be incurred by the <br />Parks system. <br />Ms. Piercy noted the tabled motion regarding Resolution 4998 from the January 11 council meeting. <br />Ms. Brotherton, responding to a question from Mr. Clark, stated there were two motions currently on the <br />table, a motion to adopt Resolution 4998 and a motion to amend the same. <br />Mr. Clark asked if any measurement existed for comparing the deferment of inflationary adjustments of <br />SDC’s and the impact of higher and lower SDC’s on development in general in similar municipalities. <br />Mr. Schoening responded that City staff had surveyed other communities throughout the State of Oregon <br />and found Eugene to be in the “mid to low-mid” range in terms of the assessment of SDC’s. He was <br />unaware of any analyses specifically designed to determine if SDC’s were or were not a significant <br />barrier to development. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 13, 2009 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.