Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Action: An Ordinance Concerning the Walnut Station Mixed-Use Center <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: July 12, 2010 Agenda Item Number: 3 <br />Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Lydia McKinney <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: (541) 682-5485 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />The City Council will take action on an ordinance concerning implementation of the Walnut Station <br />Mixed-Use Center project. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />On June 21, 2010, the City Council held a public hearing to consider an ordinance that implements the <br />Walnut Station Mixed-Use Center project. Staff has prepared a memorandum which provides a <br />response to the issues raised in the oral and written testimony, included as Attachment A. Attachment B <br />includes all the public testimony that has been submitted on the project since June 9, 2010. <br /> <br />Testimony has been generally supportive of the project, with a few specific exceptions. Several who <br />spoke from the Fairmount neighborhood raised concerns with regards to traffic impacts, potential <br />spillover parking impacts, and general neighborhood compatibility issues. Many of these concerns have <br />been addressed with policy revisions that have been included in the Walnut Station Specific Area Plan <br />(Attachment E, Exhibit C). As explained at the public hearing, these policy changes were made to <br />address neighborhood concerns and were approved by the Fairmount neighborhood representatives prior <br />to the hearing. These policy revisions are also supported by the remainder of the stakeholders and <br />information in the record. <br /> <br />Many who submitted testimony, including the University of Oregon, the Chamber of Commerce, and <br />local business owners, indicated that while they favor the project overall, they do not support the <br />Planning Commission’s recommendation to change the Type II appeals authority from the Hearings <br />Official to the Planning Commission. In addition, staff understands that Fairmount neighborhood <br />representatives do not object to maintaining the current appeals process. Therefore, staff is <br />recommending the standard Type II process for the City’s consideration of design review appeals, <br />instead of the specialized process recommended by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Attached to this agenda item summary (AIS) are two versions (“A” and “B”) of the ordinance. Version <br />A of the ordinance is drafted so that an appeal of a design review decision would be considered by the <br />Hearings Official, like other Type II decisions. Version B is the ordinance as it was recommended by <br />the Planning Commission and presented for the public hearing. Version B includes changes to Eugene <br />Code (EC) 9.7055 and 9.7605 that create a specialized process for the City’s consideration of design <br />review appeals. The exhibits to Version A and Version B of the ordinance are the same. <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100712\S1007123.doc <br /> <br />