Laserfiche WebLink
cause to investigate reports of certain criminal behavior and take enforcement action would eliminate the <br />need to call EPD simply to issue a citation. Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 352.385 grants <br />commissioned public safety officers, such as UODPS public safety officers, the authority to arrest on <br />probable cause, but as it is now written, E.C. 4.035 does not grant this authority for violations or crimes <br />in the Eugene Code. <br /> <br />An example of a common situation where UODPS and EPD would benefit from the expanded citation <br />authority would be a case where UODPS receives a report of a stolen laptop computer. The UODPS is <br />notified when a reported stolen computer is accessing the UO network and the location is pin-pointed. <br />UODPS officers contact the person using the stolen computer, and after interviewing the subject, learn <br />the individual had actually stolen the computer. Even though UODPS did not witness the actual theft, <br />they developed probable cause to believe the suspect did take the computer by the subject admitting to <br />the crime, and also by being in possession of the stolen computer. As the ordinance stands now, UODPS <br />officers would need to contact EPD, explain the probable cause for the offense, and then have the EPD <br />officer come to the UO to issue the citation. <br /> <br />When the proposal to amend the Eugene Code to give UODPS the authority to issue citations based <br />upon probable cause is viewed through a quick triple bottom line analysis, these impacts are evident: <br /> <br /> <br />Environmental health is addressed when unnecessary gasoline consumption and extra vehicle <br />trips to the UO campus are eliminated. If the proposed amendment to E.C. 4.035 is adopted by <br />the council, in those cases where UODPS can cite individuals through probable cause, EPD will <br />not be required to join the UODPS officers for what is essentially a paper work function. <br /> <br /> <br />The primary economic benefit to the Eugene community and Oregon taxpayers to be gained <br />through the proposed amendment will be the elimination of duplicated workload. UODPS is <br />able to perform the function of investigating and charging subjects for a crime without an EPD <br />officer needing to come along behind and duplicate the work already done. <br /> <br /> <br />The primary social equity benefit is the increased ability of UODPS to provide policing that is <br />culturally aligned with the campus community. Some differences in the priority of crime <br />responses are culturally-based, for example the laptop theft discussed above would not reach the <br />level of priority of response for an EPD detective due to the dollar threshold for EPD <br />investigations. On campus, the crime is one that would be prioritized for UODPS response. By <br />aligning the authority of UODPS officers with justice and overall livability values of the <br />University, the change to E.C. 4.035 provides a social equity benefit. <br /> <br />From January 1, 2010, through October 5, 2010, the UODPS issued 386 citations; 155 of the total were <br />for Minor in Possession of Alcohol, 65 for Possession of Less than One Ounce of Marijuana, and 50 for <br />Consumption of Alcohol on an Unlicensed Premises. Please see Attachment B for a statistical report of <br />violations and crimes addressed by the UODPS through their citation authority. It should be noted that <br />this amendment to EC 4.035 only gives UODPS officers the authority to issue citations for crimes; they <br />will not be transporting and lodging offenders. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The City of Eugene has previously granted authority to the UODPS officers to enforce certain municipal <br />violations and misdemeanor crimes if there is cause for them to do so, including some violations for <br />which there are no comparable offenses under State law, such as violation of the City’s noise ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />