Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Following council direction, a staff report of the activity recorded in the Downtown Public Safety Zone <br />was provided to the Eugene Police Commission. This report is available on the Police Commission <br />website, (a hyperlink is provided in the electronic version of this agenda item summary to: (DPSZ <br />Activity Report)) and the report is available in hard copy for the council if desired. The Police <br />Commission reviewed the report and held a forum on September 1, 2010, to obtain public input <br />regarding the effectiveness of the ordinance in reducing targeted incidents in the DPSZ. On October 8, <br />the City Council received the Police Commission’s recommendation (see Attachment A) regarding <br />continued enforcement of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Public Comments and Police Commission Recommendation <br />At the Police Commission’s Public Forum on September 1, and the City Council’s public hearing on <br />July 29, 2010, speakers expressed both support for and opposition to the use of a civil exclusion process. <br />Those in favor primarily spoke of the need to make downtown safer, removing predators from the city’s <br />core and their view that the DPSZ was improving conditions downtown. The majority of those opposed <br />spoke against all exclusionary zones, protection of First Amendment rights and fear that homeless <br />individuals and youth may be unfairly targeted for exclusion. The Police Commission summarized the <br />concerns they heard from the Public Forum and their reactions to the Downtown Public Safety Zone <br />Activity Report in their October 8, 2010, memorandum to the City Council. Their recommendation to <br />the council emphasized four main points: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Continue the DPSZ and work with stakeholders to resolve outstanding issues in the ordinance; <br /> <br /> <br />Add sexual offenses and tie state statutes to municipal codes; <br /> <br /> <br />Discuss options to mitigate aspects of the due process; and <br /> <br /> <br />Consider greater support and funding to social service agencies to aid in the overall criminal <br />justice system. <br /> <br />Proposed Amendments to the DPSZ Ordinance <br />At the October 25, 2010, City Council work session, Chief Kerns presented information on the status of <br />the DPSZ and Municipal Court Judge Allen was present to answer questions regarding the process of <br />civil exclusions through the Eugene Municipal Court. Following the October work session, a public <br />hearing was held on November 22, 2010. The proposed ordinance offered at the public hearing (see <br />attachment B) provided three changes to the existing DPSZ ordinance. These included: <br /> <br /> <br />Extending the DPSZ for 18 months so additional police officers appropriated through the FY11 <br />budget may complete their training and the new Downtown Police Team can be established as a <br />continuous, year-round assignment. With this team in place the department should have <br />additional resources to resolve many of the crimes and violations occurring in the downtown <br />core and by 2012, the additional jail beds the City proposes to add should be providing an <br />additional deterrent to crime. <br /> <br /> <br />Adding sexual violations and crimes to the ordinance. Chief Kerns, working with City <br />Prosecutor Dan Barkovic, Eugene Municipal Court Judge Allen, Public Defender Dan Neal, <br />representatives from the City Attorney’s Office and other staff have identified additional <br />offenses to add to Section 4.874 of the Eugene Code. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Adding Oregon Revised Statutes to applicable provisions for which the municipal court may <br />exclude individuals for 90 days following a show cause hearing or for one year following a <br />conviction. A list of all violations and crimes is provided as Attachment D. <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M101208\S101208B.doc <br /> <br />