Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Also based on the City Council discussion at the public hearing, included in this AIS, and <br />specifically set out in Attachment D to this AIS, is a motion to amend the ordinance to establish a <br />lower assessment (75 percent as much as properties abutting the street to be improved) for properties <br />on already-improved cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets that are dependent upon the street being <br />improved for access to the street system and that are to be included in the local improvement district <br />for the street improvement. <br /> <br />Summary of Changes to the Eugene Code <br /> <br />The following paragraphs summarize the changes to the Eugene Code that will affect the <br /> <br />computation, apportionment and deferral of street assessments. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The method of apportionment of assessable costs between residential and non-residential <br />properties will be based upon lot frontage, lot area or a combination of lot frontage and area. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />A uniform assessment methodology is established for residential properties based upon a <br />residential assessment unit (RAU) with single family, duplex and tri-plex dwellings being <br />assigned one RAU and multi-family dwellings being assigned 0.25 RAU per dwelling unit. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The method of apportionment of assessable costs among non-residential properties will be based <br />upon lot frontage, lot area or a combination of lot frontage and area. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Properties on cul-de-sacs and dead-end streets that are dependent upon the street being improved <br />for access to the street system will be included in the local improvement district and be assessed <br />for the street improvement. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Street assessments may be deferred until the sale or transfer of property. The deferral would be <br />limited to owner-occupied single-family and duplex homes and contingent on the availability of <br />funds. Eligible property owners may defer their assessment or receive a low-income subsidy, but <br />cannot receive both forms of assistance. <br /> <br />Related Policy Implications <br /> <br />The following paragraphs outline the policy implications of proposed changes that were identified in <br />the council work session or that became apparent with the development of the draft ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Currently, the Eugene Code makes a distinction between vacant, partially developed and <br />developed properties and between properties less than a ½ acre and equal to or greater than ½ <br />acre in size when determining assessable frontage and timing of assessment. The “partially <br />developed” distinction will no longer apply – the residential assessment unit (RAU) applies to <br />residentially zoned lots developed with single-family or duplex dwellings irrespective of lot size. <br />The ½ acre size applies only to vacant lots and affects only the timing of payment of the <br />assessment. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />For vacant lots in a residential zone, the number of assessment units is determined by the <br />minimum number of dwelling units required per acre (minimum density required) in the zone; <br />currently, there is no minimum density per acre required in a low density residential zone, so <br />vacant lots of any size in this zone would be assessed only the minimum of one RAU. <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M101213\S1012138a.doc <br /> <br />