Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />additional written comments received before the work session on January 11, 2010, will be <br />provided at the work session. <br /> <br />During the November 10, 2010, work session, information was requested regarding how the sale <br />of surplus water to Veneta was consistent with the City’s Growth Management Policies 1, 2, 5, <br />and 10, and how the sale related to and whether or not it was consistent with the Statewide <br />Planning Goals 2, 11, and 14. <br /> <br />In the case of the City’s Growth Management Policies, it is difficult to make determinations of <br />consistency with respect to the sale of surplus water to the City of Veneta given the Eugene- <br />specific nature of the policies. The Growth Management Policies were more recently integrated <br />into the City’s land use code which also helps clarify their scope and purpose. It states “These <br />policies shall serve as guidance as the city considers proposed changes to this land use code” (EC <br />9.0020(1)). Accordingly, they were not meant to be used as a means for evaluating regional <br />growth issues, including how surrounding communities should grow. <br /> <br />Additionally, the Statewide Planning Goals do not apply to this sale of surplus water because the <br />sale would not result in the application of urban services onto rural lands. Accordingly, surplus <br />water could be provided to Veneta without conflicting with or violating these statewide goals. <br /> <br />The fact that these policies and strategies do not directly apply to this sale does not end the <br />discussion, but rather, highlights the need to have a broader discussion about developing a <br />“Regional Water Master Plan” and the issues and opportunities associated with such an effort. <br />Issues such as water right perfection, addressing and mitigating risk, infrastructure planning and <br />costs, efficiency and cost savings opportunities, regional growth, and triple-bottom-line analysis <br />could all be discussed as part of a regional planning effort. Councilor Zelenka has drafted his <br />thoughts for beginning such an effort. A copy of this is attached as Exhibit B. <br /> <br />EWEB is open to further discussion on a regional drinking water plan to test interest from other <br />agencies and if there is interest, to develop a clear purpose, scope and roles/responsibilities. <br />EWEB has stated that for years they have participated in regional planning efforts and continues <br />to see the value in taking a regional and long-term view on drinking water supplies. The 1963 <br />water right was applied for within the context of a regional water supply relationship. The most <br />viable approach to securing a secondary source of drinking water for Eugene customers in the <br />future is via partnerships that address mutual and differing needs of our neighbors. <br /> <br />In any case, the City of Veneta has requested the City of Eugene support the sale of surplus <br />water pending the outcome of the appeal. While Veneta’s Annual Daily Demand for their 20 <br />year build out is four million gallons per day (mgd), an approval of three mgd will allow Veneta <br />to move forward with the project and take advantage of the federal funding package they have <br />received. Additional provisions may also be included as a condition of support. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />There are no specific City policies to be considered by the City Council at this meeting; it is a <br />status update and informational meeting. <br /> <br /> \\Cesrv500\cc support\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M110111\S110111C.doc <br /> <br />