Laserfiche WebLink
Immerman was particularly interested in seeing the commercial component of the Price - Anderson Act <br />eliminated. He urged the council to investigate the act, which largely indemnified the nuclear industry <br />from damages and placed the burden on the taxpayer. He also maintained that the media was not <br />reporting "near- misses" in the commercial nuclear industry, and monitoring had been cut by Congress <br />because of shut downs caused by "extreme near -miss events." Mr. Immerman called for a realistic <br />examination of the seismic risk to nuclear facilities. He provided information regarding the Price - <br />Anderson Act to the council. <br />Elizabeth Remeni, 3441 Storey Boulevard, said the majority of homeowners had opposed the Crest <br />Drive street improvement project without success. She understood that as a result of recent code changes, <br />the City was no longer going to charge citizens to pay for improvements to individual streets. She asked <br />that the property owners affected by the project be relieved of those costs, which were averaging $10,000 <br />to $13,000 per property. <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum and thanked those who spoke. In response to Mr. Fisher's <br />testimony, Mayor Piercy said the council had not yet made a decision to raze the building. The council <br />had determined that either renovation or construction would occur on the existing City Hall site. She <br />endorsed the idea of involving the HRB in the decision, and suggested the City could also consult with <br />the University of Oregon's Department of Allied Arts and Architecture. <br />Mayor Piercy called on the council for comments. <br />Speaking to Ms. Remeni's testimony, Councilor Taylor said it was not true that people would have to pay <br />street assessments. The City Council had revised the ordinance governing street assessments somewhat <br />but the charter did not allow its action to be retroactive. She said from now on, residents living on dead <br />end streets and cul -de -sacs adjacent to a street improvement project would have to share in the costs. <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br />- January 26, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 8, 2011, Joint Elected Officials Meeting <br />- February 9, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 14, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 16, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 22, 2011, Public Hearing <br />- February 23, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 28, 2011, Work Session <br />- February 28, 2011, Regular Meeting <br />- March 14, 2011, Work Session <br />- March 14, 2011, Regular Meeting <br />B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda <br />C. Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Minutes of March 31, 2011 <br />D. Timeline for City Council Employee Performance Reviews for 2011 <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Brown, moved to approve the items on the <br />Consent Calendar. <br />Councilor Poling pulled Item B. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council April 11, 2011 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />