Laserfiche WebLink
wounds to your pride that come with being at the mercy of an organization that prioritizes rules over <br />humanity." She cited the mission's refusal to allow Thomas Egan to stay there in support of her criticism. <br />She said after the councilors learned why so many people refused to stay at the mission she challenged <br />them to stay at a City park to have that experience. Otherwise, councilors' judgments about Occupy <br />Eugene were suspect. <br />Randy Prince, 2990 Onyx Street, was happy to see the sidewalks downtown reopened. He <br />acknowledged that sometimes sidewalk closures were necessary to accommodate construction but averred <br />that other cities "got to great extents" to keep public sidewalks open in such instances. He hoped to see <br />more sidewalk maintenance downtown and suggested design changes might also be in order. He <br />advocated for newer technology for the downtown lighting fixtures. Mr. Prince supported the <br />broadcasting of classical music downtown and suggested that local radio station KWAX be used as a <br />source for programming. <br />Howard Bonnett, 1835 East 28 Avenue, provided written testimony regarding the BPMP to the council. <br />He recalled his first week in Eugene in 1965, when he could not find a bicycle rack to park his bicycle at <br />the University of Oregon without a considerable search. Since then much progress had been made in the <br />community's active transportation efforts. He commended the council for its earlier discussion about the <br />BPMP at the work session and encouraged the council to accept the plan. <br />Sue Wolling, 108 High Street, said the projects in the BPMP were a key element in the implementation <br />of Envision Eugene. She encouraged staff to review the performance measures in the plan to ensure they <br />were aligned with the plan goals to increase alternate modes use. She suggested the City might need to <br />invest in technology to better count alternate mode trips. Ms. Wolling also recommended another <br />examination of the project priorities because in many cases the source of the project was not clear. She <br />also advocated for development of criteria to guide the prioritization process. She agreed with testimony <br />calling for dedicated project funding. <br />Dennis Cassady, PO Box 4028, Eugene, contrasted the higher fees and staffing levels of Eugene's Rental <br />Housing Program to Corvallis's program. He believed that if the revenues collected in Eugene had not <br />been sequestered they would have already been used by other City departments for purposes not related to <br />the program. He questioned the accounting for the program, noting he had been billed by the program for <br />two houses for which he did not even yet have an occupancy permit. He attended meetings of the <br />department advisory committee (DAC) overseeing the program and found accounting discrepancies in the <br />information presented to the DAC. Mr. Cassady said staff advertised the program extensively to students <br />to attempt to get tenant involvement, but none showed interest. A former member of the DAC, Daniel <br />Prince, told The Register -Guard that the program had come close to outliving its usefulness. Mr. Cassady <br />recommended the program be ended and the excess funds returned to the landlords. <br />Scott Sanders, 4195 Berrywood Drive, asked the council to terminate the Rental Housing Code. He <br />questioned what benefit the community gained from the program when weighed against its costs. The <br />program was redundant of other government programs. Tenants could seek remedies through small <br />claims courts or avoid poor landlords. In five years, the program had 150 complaints that led to City <br />action at an average cost of $11,600 per complaint. The majority of funds went to collect more funds. He <br />believed the program should be ended for because it could not be justified on a cost - benefit basis. <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street, #307, expressed concern about the music broadcast at Kesey <br />Square. He suggested that the City could support local musicians at the site, which was one of the few <br />public spaces available in Eugene. He said that similar tactics were being used around the country, and it <br />was not right, because the public square belonged to the people, who would not stand for any more. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council November 14, 2011 Page 3 <br />Regular Meeting <br />