Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />Council Chamber —City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street— Eugene, Oregon <br />April 16, 2012 <br />7:30 p.m. <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Brown, Pat Farr, Betty Taylor, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, <br />Chris Pryor. <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br />In the absence of Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy, Council President George Brown called the April 16, <br />2012, public hearing of the Eugene City Council to order. <br />1. PUBLIC HEARING: <br />An Ordinance Concerning Infill Compatibility Standards Related to Multi- Family <br />Developments, Multi- Family Zoning, Garbage and Recycling Screening, and Bicycle <br />Parking; and Amending Sections 9.0500, 9.2750, 9.2751, 9.3125, 9.3626, 9.5500, 9.6105, <br />9.6410, 9.6740, 9.6745, and 9.8030 of the Eugene Code, 1971 (City File CA 11 -2) <br />Assistant City Manager/Planning and Development Director Sarah Medary introduced the item, an <br />ordinance adopting new infill standards for multi - family housing. The purpose of the ordinance was to <br />clarify the Land Use Code to improve neighborhood livability and implement the strategies of Envision <br />Eugene. She reported that the Planning Commission unanimously supported the ordinance before the <br />council. <br />Councilor Brown opened the public hearing. <br />Carolyn Jacobs, 2040 Agate Street, advocated for the required inclusion of open space in dense housing, <br />noting that many cities required such amenities, particularly for larger developments. She recommended <br />that the council adopt a "step it back as you step it up" approach to design that allowed for both viable <br />lower density R -1 development and higher density R -3 development in the South University <br />Neighborhood. Ms. Jacobs recalled that in 2008, the Infill Compatibility Standards (ICS) Task Team <br />identified encouragement of residential infill that enhanced the stability, quality, positive character, and <br />livability of residential neighborhoods as a goal. She believed the council could move the City in that <br />direction by making open space an integral element of all multi - family projects and sloped setbacks the <br />norm for every project along the R -1/R -3 interface. She believed the other code changes were well - <br />crafted and urgently needed. <br />Teresa Bishow, 2911 Tennyson Street, represented Arlie & Company. She reviewed highlights of her <br />written testimony, which she submitted into the record. She suggested that the City adopt clear standards <br />if it was trying to provide open space on a per project basis. However, she did not support the same <br />approach to mixed -use areas because of the additional density requirements and because those areas were <br />intended to support a broader range of uses and functions at a density that supported transit. Ms. Bishow <br />asked the council to eliminate the special standards in the R -3 and R -4 zones related to driveways, which <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council April 16, 2012 Page 1 <br />Public Hearing <br />