Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room--City Hall <br /> <br /> April 21, 2004 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Bonny Bettman, George Poling, Nancy Nathanson, Scott Meisner, David <br /> Kelly, Betty Taylor, Gary Papd, Jennifer Solomon. <br /> <br />His Honor Mayor James D. Torrey called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: Comcast Franchise Fee Review <br /> <br />Franchise Manager Pam Berrian of Information Services joined the council for the item. She introduced <br />Milo Mecham of Lane Council of Governments, Patty Boyle of Finance Services, and City Attorney Jerome <br />Lidz, who were also present for the item. Ms. Berrian said the issue was governed by the City's franchise <br />agreement with Comcast, a mutually negotiated contract outlining the conditions under which the cable <br />company was permitted to make nonexclusive commercial use of public rights-of-way. The contents and <br />enforcement of the agreement are governed by local, state, and federal law, and address things such as <br />compensation for the private use of the public right-of-way, customer service standards, construction <br />requirements and the like. <br /> <br />Continuing, Ms. Berrian said the franchise fees were a percentage of revenue earned in the service territory. <br />An unresolved dispute exists over a category of Comcast revenue earned in the local franchise service area. <br />An independent financial review indicated Comcast underpaid franchise fees from advertising commissions <br />and program launch revenues for a period of three years and a debt was owed to the City as well as to Lane <br />County and Springfield because of their franchise agreements with the company. Comcast disputed the <br />review's findings but the three jurisdictions did not accept the rationale offered by the organization. Because <br />the dispute could not be resolved, staff was seeking authority from the council to enter into binding <br />arbitration with Comcast in accordance with the franchise. She said the Metropolitan Policy Committee <br />(MPC), which acts as the Cable Commission, would consider the matter in May. <br /> <br />Ms. Berrian noted that the Lane Board of County Commissioners authorized County staff to enter into <br />arbitration, and the City of Springfield had held an informational work session on the subject. <br /> <br />Ms. Berrian reported that Comcast asked staff to delay initiating binding arbitration until one or more other <br />municipal arbitration cases were resolved. She recommended against that because staff believed the <br />review's findings were valid, a year had been spent attempting to reach resolution, and staff had yet to <br />receive the third-party agreements Comcast had with other agencies that it requested. Additionally, other <br />arbitration decisions could not be applicable outside the specific jurisdictions in question unless Comcast <br />specifically agreed to abide by the decisions in those cases. There was no guarantee that would occur. <br />Finally, the franchise agreement requires Comcast to reimburse the City for its arbitration costs if the City <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 21, 2004 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />