Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Meisner suggested that the local impact of Ballot Measure 30 had already been felt. He had been asked <br />to serve on an interview panel by the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to replace the single <br />person who makes all passenger rail decisions in the state. After the interview process had been completed, <br />Bruce Warner of ODOT indicated the position would not be filled after all. Mr. Meisner anticipated that by <br />the end of the fiscal year, one train would be lost and the other train's funding would be threatened. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner noted that the council received a copy of the 2003 citizen survey in its latest meeting packet. <br />He was discouraged by the fact the council had spent considerable time and energy in the past year on issues <br />of animal control, a service for which the City was not responsible. He said that the first question in the <br />survey asked respondents to rank the following City services, and that included animal control. He thought <br />that was misleading to the public. He noted that the service received a low ranking from respondents. He <br />hoped that was corrected in the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon arrived. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ also was concerned about the impact of the failure of Ballot Measure 30 on the City budget. He <br />urged State legislators to solve the State budget problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ was glad the survey was ready in time for the council's goals session. He encouraged councilors <br />to speak to the facilitator for the session, Julia Novak. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ requested council consent to move Wednesday meetings to the library. Mayor Torrey suggested <br />that the issue be raised at the two-day goals session. City Manager Taylor endorsed the mayor's suggestion, <br />noting that there were logistical issues involved. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested that the McNutt Room be enlarged when the Fire and Emergency Medical Services <br />Department moved out of City Hall. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested that the council was overlooking its goal regarding fair and equitable financing, and <br />advocated for a discussion on the topic. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor continued to be concerned about the impact of development in the south hills, citing logging, <br />overdevelopment, and erosion as specific concerns. She said there was a perception among certain groups <br />that the Planning Division helped developers ~get around regulations" but would not help residents protect <br />their properties. Ms. Taylor also continued to be concerned about the Amazon Headwaters and said it <br />should be part of the City's park system. She said the City sought money for protection of Amazon Creek <br />downstream while allowing its headwaters to be polluted by logging. Ms. Taylor believed the City's tree <br />protection ordinance was inadequate as property owners were still allowed to remove five trees from their <br />properties each year, allowing sequential clearing with impacts on the environment. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor maintained that the council had neglected to discuss the possibility of having a City performance <br />auditor, which was recommended to the council by the Citizen Charter Review Committee. She averred <br />that the council, without discussion, did not put the question of the auditor on the ballot. She said the topic <br />would be discussed at an upcoming City Club meeting and encouraged councilors to attend and learn more. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 9, 2004 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />