Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Work Session <br /> McNutt Room-City Hall <br /> <br /> January 28, 2004 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Gary Pap6, Nancy Nathanson, Scott Meisner, David Kelly, Betty Taylor <br /> Bonny Bettman, George Poling, Jennifer Solomon. <br /> <br />His Honor Mayor James D. Torrey called the meeting to order. <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: Transportation Financing <br /> <br />City Manager Dennis Taylor stated that the work session was a continuation of the conversation on <br />transportation funding and an outgrowth from the joint meeting held on this subject with the Lane Board of <br />County Commissioners and elected officials of other jurisdictions in Lane County. He said the work <br />session was intended to get council direction on the response the City should give to the County. He <br />introduced Kurt Corey, Director of the Public Works Department, who spoke on the issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey noted that on numerous occasions the department had provided a well-documented need to <br />reduce the backlog of deferred maintenance in the City of Eugene. He said there had been similar <br />difficulties in the operating side of the Road Fund. He briefly highlighted the recent developments <br />authorized by the City Council and legislature to implement two new revenue sources, the gas tax and the <br />transportation system maintenance fee (TSMF). He stated that several projects had been completed with <br />this revenue. He recalled the council's decision to repeal the TSMF in late 2003. The board had requested <br />specific feedback in three areas from individual cities pursuant to the joint meeting held in November: <br /> <br /> 1) To the extent that Lane County would agree to share the new money from House Bill 2041, <br /> also known as the Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) III, under what formula <br /> should the distribution of those dollars be made to the cities of Lane County? <br /> 2) Do the cities within Lane County, specifically Eugene and Springfield, have a willingness to <br /> participate in looking at an operational efficiency audit by an outside consultant? <br /> 3) What recommendations might the City have as far as other potential revenue sources? <br /> <br />Mr. Corey stated that there would be a presentation to the Budget Committee on broader Road Fund issues <br />on February 18. He said that absent an infusion of new money, the operating side of the Road Fund would <br />be up to $2 million out-of-balance in fiscal year (FY) 2005 and the capital preservation side would be up to <br />$6 million out-of-balance in that fiscal year. He estimated that the new OTIA funding to be received by the <br />County could amount to $1.4 million per year and depending on the funding formula, as yet to be <br />determined, the City would stand to receive approximately $700,000 per year. Regarding additional <br />revenue sources discussed at the County level, Mr. Corey said a countywide gas tax could yield $620,000 <br />per year and a potential vehicle registration fee increase could yield up to $4 million per year to Eugene. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey stated, regarding the OTIA III distribution formula the City would recommend to the County, <br /> <br /> <br />