Laserfiche WebLink
University of Oregon (UO), neighborhood organizations, and the police. He called for a focus on <br />problems rather than penalties. <br />Dennis Chapa, Lane County, opposed the council's decision to strike the sunset clause associated with <br />the Rental Housing Code and asked the council to reconsider its action. He asked those in attendance <br />who supported having the sunset clause reinstated to stand. Many people stood. <br />Carla Newbre, Ward 1, recommended that the council make its legislative intent regarding the social <br />host ordinance clear to avoid the possible result of chilling the freedom of speech. She encouraged the <br />council to move cautiously. <br />Joe Tyndall, Ward 1, expressed concern about the council's failure to form a homeless commission and <br />support for the formation of a tent village for the homeless with land supplied by the City. <br />Ann Klemp, Ward 5, said the Rental Housing Code fee made it difficult for landlords to keep rents low. <br />She asked that the program be stopped. <br />Sam Chapman, Ward 3, opposed the proposed social host ordinance. He noted a strategy suggested by <br />the Neighborhood Livability Working Group was for an outgoing freshman orientation program. That <br />strategy was not adopted and he recommended it be reconsidered because he had seen it work. He not <br />think fining students was a way to solve drinking and recommended educational information be provided <br />with kegs sold to students. <br />Dennis Casady, Ward 2, asked the council to reinstate the sunset clause in the Rental Housing Code. He <br />believed that otherwise, his service and the service of others who served on the Housing Policy Board <br />(HBP) advisory subcommittee had been a waste of time. <br />Paul Cauthorn, Ward 2, agreed with the remarks of Mr. Casady. He believed the sunset was the only <br />way that landlords had to get accountability from the City for the program. Speaking to the proposed <br />social host ordinance, he suggested the ordinance could be misused to label a super bowl party where the <br />attendees gathered outside to throw a football as an unruly gathering. He pointed out the ordinance would <br />apply to bars, taverns, and restaurants if one considered the phrase "any place where people gather." <br />David Russell, Ward 3, a rental property owner, asked how far government would go in interfering with <br />the relationship between landlords and tenants. He was very concerned about the removal of the sunset <br />clause from the Rental Housing Code and recommended that it be reinstated. <br />William Moskal, Ward 3, expressed support for councilors Farr and Ortiz and Mayor Piercy and invited <br />everyone to the upcoming anniversary of his release from prison. <br />Eric Hall, Ward 7, expressed concern that the council had disregarded the recommendations of the HPB <br />advisory subcommittee and dropped the sunset clause from the Rental Housing Code. He asked that the <br />sunset be reinstated. <br />Paul Guernsey, Ward 3, was concerned that 15` Avenue lacked crosswalks at key intersections and <br />motorists did not yield to pedestrians. He also objected that 15` avenue was a signed bicycle path but <br />bicyclists had to stop at intersections. He recommended pedestrian corridors on roads serving the <br />University, marked crosswalks at every intersection, and stop signs on the major arterials that crossed 15` <br />Avenue traveling north -south so that motorists had to stop for bicyclists. <br />MINUTES— Eugene City Council April 23, 2012 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />