Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />1.Revise Definitions <br />The proposed ordinance requires reusable plastic bags to be a minimum of 2.25 mil in thickness. The <br />term “mil” is the industry gauge for film plastic thickness. 2.25 mil bags are not what are typically <br />considered “reusable,” for they can easily tear as compared with their more durable canvas or thicker <br />density plastic. The City of Austin’s policy requires reusable plastic bags to be four mils, which allows <br />for greater opportunities for reuse as compared with the 2.25 mil requirement. <br /> <br />Staff recommends revising Definitions to read: <br />Reusable bag <br />. A bag made of cloth or other material with handles that is specifically designed <br />and manufactured for long term multiple reuse and meets all of the following requirements: <br /> <br />a.If cloth, is machine washable or <br /> <br />b.If plastic, has a minimum plastic thickness of 2.25 4.0 mils. <br /> <br /> <br />2.Exemptions <br />The proposed ordinance states that “vendors at farmers’ markets are not subject to indicating on the <br />customer’s transaction receipt the total amount of the paper bag pass-through charge.” While this rule <br />specifies only farmers’ markets, we believe that all retail ‘fair’ events (including the Holiday Market, <br />County Fair, etc.) should be exempt from showing bag transaction costs on receipts. <br /> <br />Staff recommends revising section 6.865 to read: <br />(d) Vendors at retail fairs such as a farmers' markets or holiday fair are not subject to indicating <br />on the customer's transaction receipt the total amount of the recyclable paper bag pass through <br />charge required in section 6.860(b) of this code. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Addition of Business Hardship Exemption <br />The proposed ordinance has a placeholder for business hardship exemptions. Staff researched a number <br />of ordinances for background on this item. The City of Corvallis and City of Portland ordinances do not <br />include language for business hardship exemptions. The City of Austin, the City of Bellingham, the <br />City of San Francisco, and Santa Cruz County all have language for business hardship exemptions. We <br />reviewed the existing language in these various codes and drafted language below. <br /> <br />Staff recommends the following for business hardship exemption: <br />“The City Manager or the designee may exempt a retail establishment from the requirement set <br />forth in sections 6.855-6.860 of this code for a period of not more than one year upon the retail <br />establishment showing, in writing, that this code would create an undue hardship or practical <br />difficulty not generally applicable to other persons in similar circumstances. The decision to <br />grant or deny an exemption shall be in writing, and the City Manager’s or designee’s decision <br />shall be final.” <br />If the council approves of this revision, staff recommends the following definition of undue hardship to <br />be included in the definition section. <br />Undue hardship. <br />Circumstances or situations unique to the particular retail establishment such <br />that there are no reasonable alternatives to single-use plastic carryout bags or a recyclable <br />paper bag pass-through cannot be collected. <br /> <br />S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M121022\S1210224.doc <br />