Laserfiche WebLink
<br />criminals to dispose of stolen property. In 2009, property valued at $3.5 million was lost in <br />burglaries or robberies, while only 5% ($170,000) was recovered. In subsequent years, the <br />experience is similar, with $2.3 million stolen and 4% recovered in 2010, and $2.3 million stolen <br />and 2% recovered in 2011. These regulations are intended locate and recover stolen property, <br />and identify individuals involved in the sale of stolen property to businesses who buy regulated <br />property. <br /> <br />The following changes are proposed to align the City’s regulations with state regulations: <br />Section 4.989 (1) Adds definition of pawnbroker, pledge, and precious metal <br /> <br />- <br />Section 4.989 (3) Adds provisions for additional information that should be recorded when <br /> <br />- <br />items are purchased, and requires a photo be taken for all jewelry, gems and precious <br />metals <br />Section 4.989 (7b) Adds requirement that if the Police notify the used merchandise dealer <br /> <br />- <br />that jewelry is suspected of being stolen, the dealer cannot alter the piece <br /> <br />The following changes are proposed which will strengthen the city’s regulations and increase the <br />likelihood of returning stolen property. <br />Section 4.989 (2) Adds language which prohibits someone from owning or operating a used <br /> <br />- <br />merchandise business if they have been convicted for burglary, theft I, manufacture of a <br />controlled substance, or drug possession <br />Section 4.989 (7a) Increases the amount of time that regulated property must be held from <br /> <br />- <br />the time of purchase, from seven to fourteen days <br />Section 4.89 (10b) Adds provision that if used merchandise dealer has repeatedly and <br /> <br />- <br />substantively violated the regulations related to used merchandise dealers, the City <br />Manager may initiate judicial proceedings for injunctive relief to prohibit the person from <br />acting as used merchandise dealer, and to prohibit purchase and sale from that location <br />Section 4.990 (10a) Increase the maximum fine for first violations up to $500 from $360 <br /> <br />- <br />Section 4.990 (10b) Increases the maximum fine after three previous similar convictions <br /> <br />- <br />up to $1500, from $360 <br />Section 4.990 (10c) Increases the maximum fine after six previous similar convictions up to <br /> <br />- <br />$3000, from $360 <br />Section 4.990 (10f) Specifies that violation of the rules related to this ordinance is subject <br /> <br />- <br />to the penalties <br /> <br />Of the changes proposed, one change which may receive significant community comment <br />increases the amount of time property is held from seven to 14 days. This change is requested to <br />allow law enforcement more time to determine if the property is the subject of a theft or burglary. <br />This delay will increase the likelihood stolen property can be recovered if the crime isn’t <br />immediately reported; often, victims don’t have a complete list of stolen property at the time the <br />report is taken, so supplemental reports are provided by the victim. This proposed change will <br />have an impact on Used Merchandise Dealers because they will need additional storage space for <br />items on hold, and it will increase their need for working capital, as assets are required to be held <br />longer. <br /> <br />Another change that may generate complaints is the recommendation to regulate who can own or <br />operate as a Used Merchandise Dealer. Because this proposal is intended to curb the intentional <br /> S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M121126\S1211264.doc <br />